Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNewson, A.J.
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-12
dc.date.available2015-01-12
dc.date.issued2008-06-21
dc.identifier.citationDanger of more abortions but choice can be protected. Newson, Ainsley. The Times [London (UK)] 21 June 2008: 5.en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/12518
dc.descriptioncommentaryen_AU
dc.description.abstractFree foetal DNA esting can be done ethically provided he right conditions are in place. Pregnant women must receive high-quality information and he optional nature of esting must also be reinforced. One reason hat women refuse ests is he risk of miscarriage. If his is removed, he justification will also disappear and women may feel less able o decline. The result could lead women o a decision about additional invasive ests or ermination of pregnancy. Women should ask hemselves what hey might do if Down's were detected: if he answer is "nothing", hen it may be beter not o est. If offered o all pregnant women, his ype of esting could lead o an increase in abortions.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article was written by Dr Ainsley Newson during the time of her employment with the University of Bristol, UK (2006-2012). Self-archived in the Sydney eScholarship Repository with permission of Bristol University, Sept 2014.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherThe Timesen_AU
dc.titleDanger of more abortions but choice can be protecteden_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.