Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, K
dc.contributor.authorDay, R
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, W
dc.contributor.authorLipworth, W
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-26
dc.date.available2014-08-26
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.identifier.citationHarvey K, Day R, Campbell W, Lipworth W. 2011. Saving money on the PBS: Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab for Neovascular Macular Degeneration? Medical Journal of Australia. 194 (11), 567-568 (Lead editorial)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/11694
dc.descriptionEditorialen
dc.description.abstractFederal Health Minister Nicola Roxon recently met with an alliance of consumer, industry and other stakeholders to justify the government’s plan to indefinitely delay the listing of seven new medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). She argued that, after considering the advice of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), it was the government’s responsibility to decide whether or not to list a new drug, taking into account other priorities across the health portfolio and current fiscal circumstances. 1 Clearly, the cost of the PBS must be sustainable. However, there are other ways of reducing its cost apart from delaying the listing of drugs recommended by PBAC as cost-effective. The treatment of macular degeneration provides an illustrative example.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.publisherAMPCo.en
dc.rightsOther
dc.titleSaving money on the PBS: Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab for Neovascular Macular Degeneration?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.