Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLipworth, W
dc.contributor.authorKerridge, I
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-23
dc.date.available2014-06-23
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.identifier.citationLipworth W, Kerridge I. Where to now for health-related peer-review? J Law Medicine. 2011.18(4):724-7.en_AU
dc.identifier.otherPMID:21774269
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/10796
dc.description.abstractPeer review of health-related manuscripts has enormous power in determining what is published in health-related journals, and what makes its way into health policy and clinical practice. However, peer review is at times ethically problematic and not always effective in achieving its goals. Over the past 25 years, a large number of debates about, and studies of, the peer review process has been published. Despite this, there is limited agreement about the strengths and weaknesses of peer review, and limited evidence about whether peer review achieves its goals and whether interventions to improve it have been successful. The authors argue that this state of affairs is not acceptable and that there is a need to systematise efforts to understand and improve the review process.en_AU
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen_AU
dc.titleWhere to now for health-related journal peer review?en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.