Does regular standing improve bowel function in people with spinal cord injury?
Access status:
USyd Access
Metadata
Show full item recordType
ThesisThesis type
Masters by ResearchAuthor/s
KWOK, StephanieAbstract
Fifteen community-dwelling people with motor complete SCI above T8 participated in a 16-week trial. The trial consisted of a 6-week stand phase and a 6-week no-stand phase separated by a 4-week washout period. Participants were randomised to one of two treatment sequences. Participants ...
See moreFifteen community-dwelling people with motor complete SCI above T8 participated in a 16-week trial. The trial consisted of a 6-week stand phase and a 6-week no-stand phase separated by a 4-week washout period. Participants were randomised to one of two treatment sequences. Participants allocated to the Treatment First group stood on a tilt table five times per week for 6 weeks and then did not stand for the next 10 weeks. Participants allocated to the Control First group did the opposite: they did not stand for 10 weeks and then stood for 6 weeks. Participants in both groups received routine bowel care throughout the 16-week trial. Assessments occurred at weeks 0, 7, 10 and 17 corresponding with pre and post stand and no-stand phases. The primary outcome was time to first stool. The secondary outcomes were time to complete bowel care and six self-reported outcomes reflecting bowel function and spasticity. Results: The mean (95% CI) between-intervention difference for time to first stool was 4 minutes (-4 to 11) favouring the no-stand phase. Conclusion: A cautious interpretation of the results is that at best, standing may decrease time to first stool by 4 minutes in people with motor complete SCI, but few would consider this sufficient to justify the time and cost associated with regular standing.
See less
See moreFifteen community-dwelling people with motor complete SCI above T8 participated in a 16-week trial. The trial consisted of a 6-week stand phase and a 6-week no-stand phase separated by a 4-week washout period. Participants were randomised to one of two treatment sequences. Participants allocated to the Treatment First group stood on a tilt table five times per week for 6 weeks and then did not stand for the next 10 weeks. Participants allocated to the Control First group did the opposite: they did not stand for 10 weeks and then stood for 6 weeks. Participants in both groups received routine bowel care throughout the 16-week trial. Assessments occurred at weeks 0, 7, 10 and 17 corresponding with pre and post stand and no-stand phases. The primary outcome was time to first stool. The secondary outcomes were time to complete bowel care and six self-reported outcomes reflecting bowel function and spasticity. Results: The mean (95% CI) between-intervention difference for time to first stool was 4 minutes (-4 to 11) favouring the no-stand phase. Conclusion: A cautious interpretation of the results is that at best, standing may decrease time to first stool by 4 minutes in people with motor complete SCI, but few would consider this sufficient to justify the time and cost associated with regular standing.
See less
Date
2013-10-21Licence
The author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.Faculty/School
Sydney Medical SchoolAwarding institution
The University of SydneyShare