Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Kate Eileen
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-07
dc.date.available2013-06-07
dc.date.issued2012-11-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/9166
dc.description.abstractConversations are a recognised form of informal learning in professional workplaces. Informal conversation about teaching within university departmental contexts represents one way academics learn about university teaching. Such conversations also have the potential to more effectively link learning on formal professional development programs with teaching. As professional development of teaching is usually focused on formal courses, workshops and projects, informal conversation has not been investigated as a professional development strategy. The lack of substantial exploration of conversation as a professional development strategy was the impetus for the current study. This study investigated academics’ experience of informal conversation about teaching within their departments. Thirty academic staff working in different departments at an Australian research-intensive university were interviewed and the transcripts were analysed using grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). The analysis revealed that academics were learning about many aspects of teaching from informal conversation with their departmental colleagues. Four elements of informal conversation were explored: the content of conversation, the purpose for which academics used conversation, the context which influenced conversation and the relationship between conversation and formal (course-based) professional development. In summary, academics’ conversations were about topics that included students, assessment, curriculum and evaluation, with their purposes ranging from venting their frustrations, and reassuring themselves, to managing, improving and evolving their teaching. The investigation of the role of contextual influences on informal conversation about teaching yielded a theory for the nature of conversation, based on ‘commonality’. In a context which provides variable support for teaching, increases in commonality between academic colleagues are associated with increases in frequency and usefulness of their informal conversation. The theory of commonality and the description of the nature of informal conversation derived from this study are used to show how informal conversation can enhance professional development.en_AU
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright of this thesis.
dc.subjectacademic developmenten_AU
dc.subjectinformal conversationen_AU
dc.subjectpeer learningen_AU
dc.subjectgrounded theoryen_AU
dc.subjectuniversity teachersen_AU
dc.subjectsituated learningen_AU
dc.subjecthigher educationen_AU
dc.subjectprofessional developmenten_AU
dc.subjectstaff developmenten_AU
dc.subjectacademicsen_AU
dc.subjectuniversity departmenten_AU
dc.subjectprofessional learningen_AU
dc.subjectworkplace learningen_AU
dc.subjectexperiential learningen_AU
dc.subjectlearning conversationen_AU
dc.subjecttalk about teachingen_AU
dc.titleThe nature of academics’ informal conversation about teachingen_AU
dc.typeThesisen_AU
dc.date.valid2013-01-01en_AU
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
usyd.facultyFaculty of Education and Social Worken_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.