• Irreconcilable differences? Interlocutory injunctions for defamation and privacy 

      Rolph, David
      Published 2012
      Interlocutory injunctions to restrain the publication of defamatory matter are rarely granted, as the High Court of Australia recently reaffirmed in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill. This is one of the few ...
      Open Access
      Article
    • No worries? Employers' duty of care for negligently inflicted stress 

      Rolph, David
      Published 2005
      In Koehler v Cerebos (Aust) Ltd, the High Court of Australia found that an employer did not owe a duty of care in negligence to an employee not to inflict a stress-related psychiatric injury on her. In reaching this ...
      Open Access
      Article
    • A serious harm threshold for Australian defamation law 

      Rolph, David
      Published 2022
      The recent reforms to the national, uniform defamation laws introduced a new element to the plaintiff’s cause of action: serious harm to reputation. At the same time, the statutory defence of triviality was abolished. The ...
      Open Access
      Article
    • The Future of Criminal Law 

      Loughnan, Arlie; Crofts, Thomas; McKay, Carolyn
      Published 2024-08-26
      Welcome to the future of criminal law. But what does the future of the criminal law look like? Given the fracturing that has occurred across the criminal law field – from orthodox offences and defences to novel constructions ...
      Open Access
      Conference paper
    • A time to value: Proposal for a national paid maternity leave scheme 

      Smith, Belinda
      Published 2003
      The Sex Discrimination Unit of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) issued "A Time to Value: Proposals for a National Paid Maternity Leave Scheme" in December 2002 - the report put forward a comprehensive ...
      Open Access
      Article