Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClugston, Byron
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-25
dc.date.available2010-01-25
dc.date.issued2010-01-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/5823
dc.descriptionMaster of Philosophyen_AU
dc.description.abstractFollowing P.F. Strawson's reading of Kant, the majority of the literature on transcendental arguments seeks to divorce such arguments from their original Kantian context. This thesis is concerned with Mark Sacks's recent defence of transcendental arguments, which takes a different approach. A critique is given of Sacks's work and extensions and modifications of his approach are recommended. It is proposed that certain difficulties encountered by Kant's transcendentally-ideal approach can be overcome with Hegelian solutions.en_AU
dc.publisherUniversity of Sydney.
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright of this thesis.
dc.rights.urihttp://www.library.usyd.edu.au/copyright.html
dc.subjectKanten_AU
dc.subjectHegelen_AU
dc.subjectEpistemologyen_AU
dc.subjectTranscendental Argumentsen_AU
dc.subjectP.F. Strawsonen_AU
dc.subjectPhenomenologyen_AU
dc.titleTranscendental-Phenomenological Proof and Descriptive Metaphysicsen_AU
dc.typeMasters Thesisen_AU
dc.date.valid2009-01-01en_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.