Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNew, Thomas Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-16T00:59:29Z
dc.date.available2026-06-16T00:59:29Z
dc.date.issued2026en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35426
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractMantle circulation models, numerical models of whole-mantle convection driven by tectonic reconstructions, are widely used to predict present-day mantle structure and, in turn, to evaluate the reconstructions themselves. Yet many studies compare modelled temperature fields directly with seismic tomography, overlooking nonlinearity in the temperature-velocity relationship, the strongly heterogeneous resolution of seismic imaging, and misfit metrics that saturate when anomalies do not overlap. This thesis develops a robust, physically consistent approach to evaluating competing tectonic reconstructions against tomography. I first develop a transferable comparison methodology, demonstrated with the G-ADOPT finite-element modelling library, comprising: (i) physically consistent conversion of predicted temperatures into seismic velocities; (ii) tomographic resolution operators to filter converted structures prior to comparison; and (iii) the Wasserstein metric to quantify misfit informatively even without anomaly overlap. After benchmarking G-ADOPT models across well-studied subduction regimes, I apply these tools to the collision of the Ontong-Java plateau with the Melanesian arc, where collision timing remains uncertain (~25 vs ~12 Ma). I show that physically consistent post-processing can flip qualitative inferences of slab morphology, shift inferred slab depths by tens of kilometres, change inferred sinking rates by up to 1.2 mm/yr, and laterally displace slab anomalies by up to 639 km. Benchmarking shows G-ADOPT reproduces mantle structure well where slab rollback dominates, but predicts incorrect dip polarity where trenches advance. The case study strongly supports the older collision scenario: only the ~25 Ma model reproduces slab material beneath the Melanesian arc, with 10-28% lower misfit, supporting a role for the collision in regional plate reorganisation. These results highlight the value of publishing tomography models alongside resolution operators.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectgeodynamicsen_AU
dc.subjectmantle circulationen_AU
dc.subjectseismic tomographyen_AU
dc.titleConfronting Plate Models with the Deep Mantleen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Science::School of Geosciencesen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorSeton, Maria
usyd.include.pubYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.