Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Alon
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-07T01:10:33Z
dc.date.available2026-05-07T01:10:33Z
dc.date.issued2026en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35280
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Cochlear implant (CI) electrode position is a key determinant of postoperative auditory outcomes. Existing computed tomography (CT)-derived metrics of postoperative electrode position are inconsistently defined and poorly validated. Aims 1. Evaluate the existing literature regarding the validity of CT-derived metrics of CI electrode position. 2. Validate the accuracy and reproducibility of clinical CT-derived intracochlear electrode position metrics against microCT in implanted cadaveric temporal bones. Methods Chapter 1 systematically reviews the literature validating CT-derived metrics of intracochlear electrode position against reference standards. Chapter 2 reports a cadaveric temporal bone validation study in which implanted cadaveric temporal bones were imaged using multidetector CT (MDCT), cone-beam CT (CBCT), and micro-computed tomography (microCT). Whole array and electrode contact-level metrics were measured. Inter-modality agreement and interobserver reliability were assessed. Results Validation of existing CT-derived intracochlear electrode position metrics is limited and heterogenous. Intracochlear position metrics derived from clinical CT showed close agreement the radiological gold standard. CBCT showed consistently closer agreement with microCT than MDCT across most whole array and electrode contact-level metrics. Interobserver reliability was good to excellent for most metrics, particularly as measured on CBCT. Conclusion Clinical CT can accurately quantify intracochlear electrode position. CBCT shows the closest agreement with a radiological reference standard with high interobserver reliability. Whole array-level metrics show strong agreement across imaging modalities. Electrode contact–level metrics are reliably represented on CBCT but constrained on MDCT by spatial resolution and metal artefact. These findings establish clinical CT, particularly CBCT, as a reliable tool for postoperative CI electrode assessment.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectCochlear implantsen
dc.subjectCochlear implantationen
dc.subjectComputed tomographyen
dc.titleMicro-computed Tomography Validation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Positionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisMasters by Researchen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Westmead Clinical Schoolen
usyd.degreeMaster of Philosophy M.Philen
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorDa Cruz, Melville
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.