Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGaray-Rairan, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qi
dc.contributor.authorTricoli, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorQian, Jing
dc.contributor.authorLensky, Artem
dc.contributor.authorMurugappan, Krishnan
dc.contributor.authorSuominen, Hanna
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-29T04:50:53Z
dc.date.available2026-04-29T04:50:53Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35148
dc.description.abstractThis dataset presents a comprehensive experimental study of 72 individual zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructured sensors designed for electronic nose (E-Nose) applications, specifically targeting high-sensitivity acetone detection. The sensors were fabricated using an optimized electrodeposition process, where three key manufacturing parameters were systematically varied: ZnCl₂ molarity (0.01M to 0.2M), current density (-100µA to -5mA), and deposition time (10s to 60s). The data is organized into three primary categories: (1) Dynamic Gas Sensing Records, featuring a 3-loop exposure sequence to varying acetone concentrations (0.1 ppm to 1.0 ppm); (2) Thermal Characterization Profiles, providing baseline resistance-temperature behavior for all 72 samples; and (3) Statistical Performance Metrics, including Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) calculations and noise scaling analysis. This multi-parametric matrix (comprising over 2,000 sensing cycles) provides a critical foundation for machine learning-based gas identification and the optimization of nanomanufacturing protocols for highly sensitive, low-cost gas sensors.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
dc.subjectZnO nanostructuresen
dc.subjectElectrodepositionen
dc.subjectAcetone detectionen
dc.subjectElectronic Nose (E-Nose)en
dc.subjectChemiresistive gas sensorsen
dc.subjectNanomanufacturing optimizationen
dc.subjectSensor characterizationen
dc.subjectTime-series resistance dataen
dc.titleComprehensive Dataset of 72 Electro-deposited ZnO Nanostructured Sensors for Acetone Detection in E-Nose Applicationsen
dc.typeDataseten
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::40 ENGINEERING::4018 Nanotechnology::401806 Nanomanufacturingen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::40 ENGINEERING::4018 Nanotechnology::401805 Nanofabrication, growth and self assemblyen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::40 ENGINEERING::4018 Nanotechnology::401807 Nanomaterialsen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::46 INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCES::4611 Machine learningen
dc.identifier.doi10.25910/eb82-ng65
dc.relation.arcDP190101864
dc.relation.arcAS008
dc.description.method1. Materials and Substrates: The sensing layers were deposited on interdigitated electrodes (IDEs) sourced from Micrux Technologies (platinum electrodes on a glass substrate, 3.5 mm cell diameter). Reagents included zinc chloride (ZnCl₂ ≥ 98%) and potassium chloride (KCl ≥ 99%) from Sigma-Aldrich. High-purity gases (oxygen 99.995%, nitrogen 99.999%, and acetone 10 ppm in N₂ ) were sourced from BOC Australia. 2. Electrochemical Manufacturing (Synthesis) The 72 ZnO sensors were fabricated using a three-electrode setup via a Biologic electrochemical station. Process: Chronopotentiometry was employed at constant current settings (-100 μA, -250 μA, -500 μA, -1 mA, -3 mA, -5 mA) and varying ZnCl₂ molarities (0.01 M to 0.2 M) with a constant 0.1 M KCl background. Conditions: The electrolyte was maintained at 70°C in a silicon oil bath during deposition (times: 10s, 30s, 60s). Post-Processing: Samples were washed with deionized water, dried at 70°C, and subsequently calcined in a muffle furnace at 400°C for 2 hours to enhance crystallinity. 3. Gas Sensing Experimental Setup: Tests were performed in a Linkam HFS600E-PB4 gas sensing chamber. Stabilization: Sensors were stabilized in synthetic air (0.1 L/min O₂ and 0.4 L/min N₂) at 350°C for 2 hours, followed by 2 hours at the operating temperature of 300°C to ensure a steady baseline. Gas Delivery: Acetone concentrations (0.1–1 ppm) were regulated by Bronkhorst Mass Flow Controllers (MFCs) via a custom LabVIEW program, maintaining a constant total flow rate of 0.5 L/min. Data Acquisition: Real-time resistance data was acquired using a Keithley 2700 Digital Multimeter. 4. Data Processing and Dataset Generation For each of the 72 fabrication conditions, the response was recorded for 10 acetone concentrations (0.1 to 1 ppm) and repeated for three cycles, resulting in 2,160 individual sensor responses. The data analysis (performed via Python/LabVIEW) included: Standardization: Mapping values to a [-1, 1] range. Feature Extraction: Computation of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), noise standard deviation, response time, amplitude, and baseline drift. Correction: SNR values were corrected and analyzed across the 72-sample matrix to identify optimal manufacturing parameters.en
dc.relation.otherNS210100083
dc.relation.otherFT200100939
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Engineering::School of Biomedical Engineeringen
usyd.departmentNanotechnology Research Laboratoryen
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.