Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEatock, Cathryn
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-24T08:40:07Z
dc.date.available2026-03-24T08:40:07Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35025
dc.description.abstractThe United Nations has witnessed an increasing level of recognition of Indigenous rights since the adoption of the Declaration in 2007. This thesis examines the extend to which the United Nations facilitates the recognition of Indigenous rights to self-determination in this emerging area of international law and assesses its impact domestically within settler-states. Specifically, it assesses the capacity for Indigenous advocacy at the United Nations to influence colonial-settler states’ recognition of Indigenous rights to self-determination, as asserted in the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and seeks to identify means to increase its efficacy. The study draws a comparative analysis from four settler-states, Canada, the United States of America, New Zealand and Bolivia, to highlight lessons that may inform the Australian context. The research aims to assess settler Governments’ responsiveness and capacity within the United Nations framework to better facilitate the recognition of self-determination and avenues for adjudication, reparation and redress for Indigenous Peoples. The thesis implements a Transformative Indigenous Rights Theory which privileges Indigenous voices and enacts a decolonizing intent. Methodologically, the thesis draws on interviews with Indigenous leaders involved in UN processes and an action-based praxis approach, which highlighted the correlation between local and global advocacy.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright of this thesis
dc.subjectIndigenousen
dc.subjectAboriginalen
dc.subjectrightsen
dc.subjecthuman rightsen
dc.subjectinternational law.en
dc.titleTo what extent does the United Nations facilitate self-determination and Indigenous rights to participate in decision making?en
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Social and Political Sciencesen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorCelermajer, Danielle


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.