Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Sullivan, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-12T10:49:17Z
dc.date.available2026-01-12T10:49:17Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34679
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is standard of care for the management of benign large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs); however, electrocautery related complications and colonoscopy surveillance remain a burden for patients and health services. Alarmingly, despite the superior safety and cost-effectiveness of EMR, colorectal surgery continues to be inappropriately utilised in many centres for the resection of benign polyps. This thesis investigated key research gaps within endoscopic resection modalities, surveillance outcomes, optical diagnosis and EMR training pathways. METHODS Large prospective single and multicentre trials were conducted to address the aims of this thesis. Studies underwent ethics approval with written, informed consent obtained from all patients. RESULTS Cold snare EMR of LNPCPs, whilst safer than conventional hot snare EMR, is at the expense of significantly higher recurrence rates. In the presence of a clear resection scar at first surveillance colonoscopy, recurrence is exceedingly rare at long-term follow up for contemporary hot snare EMR with margin thermal ablation. Early post-resection surveillance remains critical, with synchronous LNPCPs highly prevalent in EMR cohorts and a more frequent finding when index lesions are non-granular. Risk assessment for submucosal invasive cancer is predictable using LNPCP characteristics and can be simplified in a decision tree algorithm to optimise optical diagnosis and resection modality selection. Challenging lesions for EMR-naïve endoscopists can be accurately predicted and incorporated into a numerical score to guide case selection for EMR training. CONCLUSIONS Overall, this thesis has widespread implications on endoscopic practice with a likely influence on international consensus guidelines. Optimisation of technique, training pathways and surveillance intervals will potentially reduce procedural burden and improve outcomes for patients and health services.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectcolonoscopyen
dc.subjectcolorectal canceren
dc.subjectresectionen
dc.subjectpolypen
dc.titleImproving the safety and efficacy of colorectal neoplasia endoscopic resectionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Westmead Clinical Schoolen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorBourke, Professor Michael


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.