Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAraullo, Rebekah
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-17T00:40:57Z
dc.date.available2025-10-17T00:40:57Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34405
dc.description.abstractDesign visualisations do not often convey information efficiently to stakeholders in urban design. While visual artefacts are intended to convey key aspects of a project, the process of tailoring them to support efficient collaboration and decision-making, particularly in the early phase of urban design, remains largely underexplored. A visual communication artefact is an object containing graphical information used in design for visual communication. This can be plans, sections, 2D, 3D or higher dimensional graphical information. Artefacts are constructed and manipulated graphical data. However, there is no universally accepted standard for the appropriate level of detail, leading to continued reliance on traditional formats. This results in a mismatch between information and needs of stakeholders. Despite ongoing advancements in information and communication technology, artefacts are often treated as standard one-size-fits-all tools. Without a deliberate process for calibrating the level and types of detail suitable for different stakeholders, these artefacts may present excessive or irrelevant data, delaying shared understanding, particularly when priorities, technical expertise or perspectives vary widely. As such, this research presents an algorithmic system for measuring visual information and evaluating this based on its fitness to meet the specific information requirements of individual stakeholders. The research highlights inefficiencies in current practice and aims to reduce these by exploring how graphical information can be more aligned with stakeholder needs. Additionally, the research contributes to emerging areas of inquiry focused on measuring aesthetics, and analysing and evaluating graphical data using computation. Aesthetics in this research leans on George Stiny and James Gips’ definition in Algorithmic Aesthetics to describe how a piece of work can be descried, interpreted and evaluated and with questions about how new works can be created.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectAesthetic Measureen
dc.subjectAlgorithmic Aestheticsen
dc.subjectOntology-based Frameworken
dc.subjectUrban Design Computational Analysisen
dc.subjectShape Algebraen
dc.subjectVisualisationen
dc.titleComputational Measure & Evaluation Of Visual Information In Communication Artefacts In Urban Designen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planningen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorMuslimin, Rizal
usyd.include.pubNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.