Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKamzabek, Takhaui
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-08T00:08:56Z
dc.date.available2025-10-08T00:08:56Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34380
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractSince Powell, Lovallo, and Fox (2011) first introduced cognitive and social psychology to the study of strategic decision-making, the concept of "behavioural strategy" has evolved significantly. In the years that followed, a substantial body of research has examined a wide range of cognitive biases and investigated strategies to mitigate their effects. This thesis evaluate whether behavioural strategy has moved beyond controlled experimental settings into real-world applications, to assess the effectiveness of debiasing mechanisms, and to explore its interaction with broader organisational theories. Chapter 2, “Behavioural Strategy in the Wild,” reviews the evolution of behavioural strategy and its application in addressing real-world challenges. It categorises debiasing techniques into three families (i.e., analytical, organisational and debate techniques) and examines their effectiveness across four domains: mergers and acquisitions (M&As), military intelligence, resource allocation, and capital projects. Chapter 3, “How organisational structure influences underperforming business units: Recovery, exit, and corporate profitability”, empirically investigates how corporate partitioning influences firms’ commitment to underperforming business units and the outcomes of such commitments. Specifically, I show that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the number of segments in which firms are organised and the likelihood of recovery for loss-making segments. Chapter 4, “From mutual forbearance to multifrontal rivalry: Conditional limits to strategic restraint”, explores the dynamics of multimarket contact and the conditions under which firms competitive arousal overrides mutual forbearance. Specifically, we show that mutual forbearance (i.e., tendency to refrain from aggressive competitive moves across shared markets) often breaks down when there are more overlaps, when the nonoverlapping segments are highly profitable and when the industry is growing.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectBehavioural strategyen
dc.subjectdebiasing mechanismsen
dc.subjectresource allocationen
dc.subjectmultimarket contacten
dc.subjectbusiness exiten
dc.subjectbusiness recoveryen
dc.titleBehavioral Strategy in the Wild: Contradictions, Divergences and Empirical Evidencesen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Business School::Discipline of Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurshipen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorLovallo, Dan
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.