Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Stephen Robert
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-27T04:03:24Z
dc.date.available2025-06-27T04:03:24Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34044
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The relevance of the human-canine relationship in terms of human wellbeing and its consideration by researchers in terms of future study design are posited to be worthy of raising increased awareness. In this thesis, wellbeing is defined by the Victorian state government’s ‘Better Health Channel’ as; “not just the absence of disease or illness. It is a complex combination of a person's physical, mental, emotional, and social health factors. Wellbeing is strongly linked to happiness and life satisfaction. In short, wellbeing could be described as how you feel about yourself and your life.” Purpose The initial survey investigation into the relevance of physical activity and exercise on sleep, with no consideration for the human-canine relationship in its study design, forms the foundation for comparison to that which investigates the relevance of the human-canine relationship in terms of interactions and cohabitation on sleep, exercise and diet, in relation to human well-being. Collectively, these findings point to the importance of the human-canine relationship and flag awareness for its consideration in research study design. Method Two survey studies were conducted. Study 1. Investigated the relationship between physical activity and exercise, and sleep. Study 2. Investigated and compared specific contributing factors for human well-being in participants with and without a companion dog in terms of: (a) Human-canine interaction (b) Human-canine cohabitation A Focus Group Study, conducted through 20 min. interactive 4 to 6 participant group Zoom discussions. Groups comprised (a) those currently having a dog and (b) those not. Subgroups, (i) companion dog owners with long term continuous dog ownership since childhood, (ii) those who do not meet criterion (i) but have had a dog for at least the past 12 months, (iii) those who had a dog in the past but not currently, (iv) those who had a dog........en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCanine-Human Relationshipen_AU
dc.subjectSleepen_AU
dc.subjectDogsen_AU
dc.subjectExerciseen_AU
dc.subjectPhysical Activityen_AU
dc.subjectWell-beingen_AU
dc.titleThe Human Canine relationship: Its Place in Human Well Being and Relevance in Research Designen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::School of Health Sciencesen_AU
usyd.departmentExercise & Sports Sciencesen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorChow, Chin Moi
usyd.include.pubYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.