Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilken, Linda Cheryl
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-28T04:47:06Z
dc.date.available2025-04-28T04:47:06Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33841
dc.description.abstractIn 2008 Australian artist Bill Henson exhibited a series of photographs that included a naked young girl. One image in particular created controversy and attracted the wrath of media, politicians, and a selection of the public. The police removed the artworks from public view and the then Australian Prime Minister called the photographs “revolting”. Henson’s art was labelled as child pornography. This incident led to changes to legislation that would have a significant impact on artists and contemporary art. The thesis posits that the way we see and encounter images of children is socially constructed and affected by our experiences of the world. Through interviews with artists and art industry representatives, the thesis argues that uncomfortable encounters between art and law have converged around images of children. Such images are now often viewed through a paedophilic lens by very different spectators, leading to the gradual erasure of children, and in particular their bodies, from Australian contemporary art. Further, through content analysis of 11 research images of children from art and advertising, and interviews about these images with legal practitioners, the thesis argues that there is no clear distinction between images of children in art and how child pornography is legally defined. While legal practitioners expressed differing opinions as to what may constitute child pornography, child abuse material or child exploitation material, they agreed that when all the circumstances of the production of the artworks were considered, none of the research images met the legal bar to warrant prosecution. Finally, the research argues that there is no clear answer to the question of when and how art becomes labelled as child pornography. Rather there is a complex and fraught web of politically charged, socio-legal, and aesthetic concerns that potentially place images of children in art, and those that produce them, within the orbit of the criminal justice system.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectArten
dc.subjectLawen
dc.subjectCriminologyen
dc.subjectcensorshipen
dc.subjectchild-imagesen
dc.titleUncomfortable Encounters Between Art, Law, and Images of Childrenen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorLee, Murray


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.