Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKarunaratne, Sascha
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-24T05:16:53Z
dc.date.available2025-02-24T05:16:53Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33660
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractFacilitating effective decision-making in healthcare is one of the key roles health professionals perform. However, a patient’s decision-making can often be complicated by the varying opinions presented to them. While some healthcare decisions have a preferred treatment option based on a health professionals’ clinical practice and knowledge of the best available evidence, decision-making for others are less clear. These decisions are deemed “preference-sensitive” and require a patient to consider their own personal needs, goals of treatment and expectations of the outcomes following treatment. One “preference-sensitive” decision is that surrounding the treatment of late stage osteoarthritis (OA) with surgery. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most common surgery recommended, and is regarded as an effective treatment to manage pain and functional deficits. However, there is a lack of consensus on the exact concurrent criteria that should be applied when recommending TKA to patients. Thus, encouraging patients to more closely consider their unique requirements of treatment and the realistic outcomes of this surgery may lead to improved decision-making. One effective way to facilitate this process and appropriately communicate this information is through patient-facing decision aids. This thesis explored the complexity of the decision-making process, and offers important contributions to the literature regarding the decision-making of patients considering TKA and the considerations health professionals integrate into their decision-making when recommending TKA to patients suffering from OA. Importantly, this thesis highlights areas of improvement in the decision-making process and identified that a co-designed patient decision aid was able to improve the decision quality of patients considering TKA. Ultimately, the findings of this thesis suggest an improved process through which patients can make evidence-informed decisions on whether to elect to undergo TKA.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright of this thesis
dc.subjectshared decision-makingen
dc.subjectdecision aiden
dc.subjectosteoarthritisen
dc.subjecttotal knee arthroplastyen
dc.subjectjoint replacementen
dc.titleDecision-Making in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)en
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Central Clinical Schoolen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorSolomon, Professor Michael
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.