Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBains, Harinda
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T21:51:31Z
dc.date.available2024-10-17T21:51:31Z
dc.date.issued2023en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33179
dc.description.abstractBeyond its scientific and technical prowess, surgery holds a unique fulfilling allure as a profession. It has upheld the highest standards and dedicated itself unwaveringly to the well- being of humanity. In return, it has earned the respect of society, other professions, and policymakers. Its steadfast nature has been a source of stability and reliability. Yet, the introduction of work time restrictions and safe working hours, as well as becoming an increasingly litigious environment are some variables that are presenting the surgical profession with various challenges. These have been reflected in clinical practice as depicted in the literature revealing progressive deterioration in perceived competencies with less autonomy as the future generation of surgeons approach the end of their training. The expectation is, however, that the same product and standard of surgeon is produced despite these progressive challenges. The aim of this study was to assess factors that contribute to perceived competencies at the different stages of surgical training by means of review articles and surveys. The survey studies in this thesis suggests that in the competition for entry into Surgical Education and Training (SET), both at the undergraduate and postgraduate medical school iilevels, has led to a diverse pool of doctors with varying ages and skill levels applying for surgical training. This diversity in age and life experiences naturally results in differences in how individuals perceive their competence and confidence. Overall, these studies revealed that a heterogenous group of doctors prepare and apply for general surgical training in Australia. The results also show that following graduation, the newly minted Australian General Surgeons are quite homogenous as a group, especially in their self-perception of their surgical skill competencies. Finally, this study highlights areas of preparation and support required for doctors applying for general surgical training.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectSurgical Competencyen_AU
dc.subjectSurgical Trainingen_AU
dc.subjectSurgery Australiaen_AU
dc.titleCompetency Assessment in General Surgical Trainingen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisMasters by Researchen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Central Clinical Schoolen_AU
usyd.degreeMaster of Philosophy M.Philen_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorYoung, Associate Professor Christopher


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.