Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Melanie Marie
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-23T01:27:44Z
dc.date.available2024-08-23T01:27:44Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32987
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores the preferences, perspectives, effectiveness of interventions and guideline recommendations surrounding opioid prescribing and deprescribing (the systematic process of tapering drugs with the intention to cease when the potential harms outweigh the benefits) targeting key patient populations and settings. Chapter one provides a summary of current evidence and challenges in ensuring safe opioid prescribing and deprescribing. Chapter two systematically reviewed the evidence on the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing opioid use in patients after orthopaedic surgery. The study found that multimodal analgesic interventions were more effective at reducing opioid use than placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control at the medium-term (<90 days) time point, while there was no compelling evidence that other pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions were effective. Chapter 3 investigated factors associated with general practitioners’ (GPs) prescribing decisions to a patient with chronic low back pain, to understand influences on clinical decision making and GPs’ willingness to accept risks versus benefits. The study found that GPs were more likely to choose a non-steroidal anti inflammatory drug (NSAID) compared to an opioid analgesic for a patient presenting with chronic low back pain. Chapters four and five explore the perspectives of Australian GPs and patients with chronic non-cancer pain on the barriers, facilitators and resources for opioid deprescribing. Overall, these studies found that GPs identified barriers such as patient’s reluctance and having a lack of time to deprescribe, while having rapport and being able to provide suitable resources to their patients facilitated the deprescribing process. Chapter six evaluates and compares international clinical guideline recommendations on opioid deprescribing in patients with chronic non-cancer pain.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectOpioidsen_AU
dc.subjectdeprescribingen_AU
dc.subjectchronic painen_AU
dc.titleOpioid prescribing and deprescribing: an investigation of preferences, perspectives, effectiveness of interventions and guideline recommendations.en_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The University of Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorLin, Professor Chung-Wei
usyd.include.pubYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.