Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIsaac, Sami
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-16T06:45:02Z
dc.date.available2024-04-16T06:45:02Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32464
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractBackground: Conscientious objection (CO) refers to the act of refusing to participate in a service on the grounds that doing so would violate one's deeply held morals and values. The aim of this thesis was to explore the implications of CO and develop an evaluated framework on managing CO in healthcare practice. Methods: A series of qualitative and mixed methods studies were conducted to meet the aim of this thesis. This included a scoping literature review, a cost analysis and mapping review, a semi-structured interview study design with qualitative thematic analysis, a mixed methods, vignette-based survey and a modified Delphi study with expert panellists from various health professions. Results: Semi-structured interviews of pharmacists revealed concerns regarding Voluntary-Assisted Dying (VAD) legislation, ethical challenges and the need for further training. Further exploring the pharmacoeconomic impact of VAD, a cost analysis mapping review identified a paucity in fiscal reporting on VAD laws in the literature and legislative reports. Mixed methods vignette-based survey studies on CO identified that a majority of participants did not conscientiously object, however of those who did, there was a statistically significant relationship with self-reported religious conviction and a justification of CO despite the risk of inequity or lack of access. Additionally, a modified Delphi study, based on advice from healthcare expert stakeholders, inaugurated a comprehensive proposed framework on how to manage CO in the healthcare setting. Conclusions: CO is multifaceted with a variety of influencing factors. The proposed CO management framework can aid in managing situations of CO in the workplace. It can also be utilised by clinical educators in pedagogy and for future healthcare providers. Future work is necessary to assess its implementation in the workplace and adapting it to various services, as well as future research into patient and consumer consensus around CO.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectConscientious objectionen
dc.subjecthealthcare professionalsen
dc.subjectframeworken
dc.subjectpolicyen
dc.subjectmedical ethicsen
dc.subjectvoluntary assisted dyingen
dc.titleCONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION IN HEALTHCAREen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The University of Sydney School of Pharmacyen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorChaar, Bouaden
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.