Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, Dennis Jay
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T00:24:35Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T00:24:35Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32129
dc.description.abstractAims This thesis investigated factors affecting radiologists' performance in mammography interpretation. It examined the association between subjective expert-determined difficulty and objective measures based on reader performance, explored reader-based and image-based influences on interpretation, and used quantised textural analysis to assess how image textures affect reader performance. Methods The study used linear mixed modelling, involving 479 Australian radiologists. The initial study involved 165 readers and one test set, while subsequent studies used six test sets and all 479 readers. It used multivariate model analysis with three models based on case-based, reader-based, and mixed characteristics. The final study utilised radiomics analysis. Results Findings demonstrated that expert-predicted difficulty in breast cancer cases correlated with breast density but did not align with actual difficulty. In normal cases, image-based characteristics significantly influenced expert-determined difficulty, while reader-based factors like weekly case interpretation and specialisation mattered. In cancer cases, image-based factors weren't significant. The mixed model analysis indicated that increasing expert-predicted difficulty reduced reader performance. The number of weekly interpreted cases also significantly affected performance. Using quantised features enhanced cancer detection compared to non-quantised textural features, with stellate masses outperforming spiculated masses. Consistently, higher expert-predicted difficulty reduced performance, while more weekly cases improved it. Conclusion The thesis highlights the importance of expert-predicted difficulty, weekly case volume, and reader- and image-based characteristics in mammography interpretation. It emphasises the need for continued exploration of texture-based radiomic analysis, contributing to improved screening and diagnostic practices in breast cancer detection and management.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectmammographyen
dc.subjecteducationen
dc.subjectexperten
dc.subjectaccuracyen
dc.subjectradiologisten
dc.titleAssociation of diagnostic errors in interpreting screening mammograms with image and reader characteristicsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::School of Health Sciencesen
usyd.departmentClinical Imagingen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorReed, Warrenen
usyd.include.pubNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.