Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeron, Yaron
dc.contributor.authorTekmen Araci, Yasemin
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-06T23:03:38Z
dc.date.available2023-12-06T23:03:38Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31941
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the ability of ChatGPT to function as a virtual colleague in helping to design materials for higher education design students. Using a self-study methodology, two university educators attempted to collaborate with ChatGPT to create course materials targeted at higher education design students, before reflecting on its strengths and weak- nesses during the process. Contextualising ChatGPT as the latest acute example of digital disruptors that design practices and processes have faced, the authors evaluated its current and potential threats and opportunities for the creation of design-focused learning content. The authors found that ChatGPT was a competent partner with regard to saving time, structuring textual content and documentation, and as a brainstorming tool. However, ChatGPT’s weaknesses included content generation that was often generic, usually requir- ing much human prompting, cajoling, and manual editing to produce desirable outcomes. Overall, ChatGPT was found to excel at its stated functionality as a language model, with some potentially useful functionality for the creation of higher education design course materials and outlines, as well as limitations. The reflections discussed can be used to inform design educators who may want to work with ChatGPT when designing course materials. However, acknowledging limitations and potential ethical challenges, the authors’ caution that educators may have to evaluate for themselves whether ChatGPT’s potential advantages outweigh its disadvantages.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofDesign Scienceen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en
dc.subjectDesign educationen
dc.subjectAIen
dc.subjectChatGPTen
dc.subjectVirtual colleagueen
dc.subjectCourse developmenten
dc.titleArtificial intelligence in design education: evaluating ChatGPT as a virtual colleague for post-graduate course developmenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/dsj.2023.28
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planningen
usyd.citation.volume9en
usyd.citation.spagee30en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.