Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNickel, Brooke
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorBarratt, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Christobel
dc.contributor.authorSpillane, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorRutherford, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorStuart, Kristy
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Geraldine
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Ann
dc.contributor.authorHersch, Jolyn
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-02T06:27:14Z
dc.date.available2023-08-02T06:27:14Z
dc.date.issued2023en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31507
dc.description.abstractManagement of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial, with clinical trials currently assessing the safety of active monitoring amidst concern about overtreatment. Little is known about general community views regarding DCIS and its management. We aimed to explore women's understanding and views about low-risk DCIS and current and potential future management options. This mixed-method study involved qualitative focus groups and brief quantitative questionnaires. Participants were screening-aged (50-74 years) women, with diverse socioeconomic backgrounds and no personal history of breast cancer/DCIS, recruited from across metropolitan Sydney, Australia. Sessions incorporated an informative presentation interspersed with group discussions which were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Fifty-six women took part in six age-stratified focus groups. Prior awareness of DCIS was limited, however women developed reasonable understanding of DCIS and the relevant issues. Overall, women expressed substantial support for active monitoring being offered as a management approach for low-risk DCIS, and many were interested in participating in a hypothetical clinical trial. Although some women expressed concern that current management may sometimes represent overtreatment, there were mixed views about personally accepting monitoring. Women noted a number of important questions and considerations that would factor into their decision making. Our findings about women's perceptions of active monitoring for DCIS are timely while results of ongoing clinical trials of monitoring are awaited, and may inform clinicians and investigators designing future, similar trials. Exploration of offering well-informed patients the choice of non-surgical management of low-risk DCIS, even outside a clinical trial setting, may be warranted.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofPLOS Oneen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectCancer treatmenten_AU
dc.subjectBreast canceren_AU
dc.subjectInvasive tumorsen_AU
dc.subjectCancer screeningen_AU
dc.subjectSurgical and invasive medical proceduresen_AU
dc.subjectDecision makingen_AU
dc.subjectCancer risk factorsen_AU
dc.subjectMastectomyen_AU
dc.titleWomen’s views about current and future management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS): a mixed-methods studyen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::42 HEALTH SCIENCES::4206 Public health::420605 Preventative health careen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::42 HEALTH SCIENCES::4203 Health services and systems::420309 Health managementen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0288972
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.relation.otherSydney Catalyst: the Translational Cancer Research Centre
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.citation.volume18en_AU
usyd.citation.issue7en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.