Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmidt, Austin
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T06:13:30Z
dc.date.available2023-06-29T06:13:30Z
dc.date.issued2023en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31409
dc.description.abstractThere are assumptions that undergird the discipline and practice of political economy. We address this by focusing on one contracted point of tension within political economy that is of great concern post-GFC. Namely, how are the presuppositions concerning the nature of temporality within the field of political economy determinate of deficient accounts of speculation, value, and even financialization more broadly? Thus, we argue that the temporal assumptions of political economy are abstractions that demand a demystifying critique. In particular, we contest linear notions of time that presume 1) a sequence of moments and 2) the idea that the future – as such – exists. We appeal to the speculative theories of Henri Bergson and Gilles Deleuze to provide both a critique of temporality and also a prescriptive theoretical apparatus for constructive engagement with financial temporality. This takes place, first, through an elaboration of Bergson’s conception of duration and in Deleuze’s Three Syntheses of Time. Once elaborated, we, second, use our theoretical apparatus as a heuristic to critically engage three prominent political economic persuasions: the Marxian, Keynesian, and Critical Finance traditions. Each of these open an aperture on finance that is valuable but limited. These limitations reveal how and in what ways each are formalist projects trapped within their own schematic limitations because of the ways they think about time and finance in extensional terms; which in turn impacts how they understand the logic(s) of finance. Therefore, in order to avoid reproducing these schematic limitations, we, third, close our project by speculatively proposing a novel conception of financial temporality: what we call the ‘techno-temporal logic of finance’. This concept allows us to sidestep the limitations revealed in the Marxian, Keynesian, and Critical Finance approaches, while also constructively indicating novel ways we might be able to think according to finance.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectDeleuzeen_AU
dc.subjectFinanceen_AU
dc.subjectDerivativesen_AU
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_AU
dc.subjectPolitical Economyen_AU
dc.subjectSocial Theoryen_AU
dc.titleThinking According to Finance: A Critique of Financial Temporalityen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Social and Political Sciencesen_AU
usyd.departmentDiscipline of Political Economyen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorKonings, Martijn


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.