Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarr, Georgia
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T05:51:59Z
dc.date.available2023-04-12T05:51:59Z
dc.date.issued2023en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31095
dc.description.abstractComprehensive sex education contributes to positive health and social outcomes, including decreasing rates of sexually transmitted infections and increasing acceptance of gender and sexuality diversity (UNESCO 2018a). While there is extensive evidence that sex education accomplishes these outcomes, little is known about how they are achieved. This thesis seeks to describe what actually goes on inside sex education classrooms. The data for this study are 30 hours of video recordings of Year 9 Personal Development, Health and Physical Education (PDHPE) lessons on sex education delivered at an all-girls school in Sydney. In particular, this thesis describes the pedagogy of consent and respect. It shows that consent is taught through a process called technicalisation. Evaluative meanings such as wanting sex or feeling afraid are discharged, instead foregrounding the legal definition of consent. In the assessment task, students must demonstrate their understanding of both the legal definition of consent and the evaluative meanings that underpin it. By contrast, respect is taught through a process called iconisation. Respect hypercharges evaluative meanings, functioning as something you do (you respect the other person), something you are (we are respectful to each other) and an abstract concept (respect is really important). The process of iconisation discharges ideational meaning and neutralises the field, making respect something that applies to all people and situations. This thesis draws on a range of Systemic Functional Linguistic tools including APPRAISAL (Martin & White 2005), field (Doran & Martin 2021) and genre (Martin & Rose 2008). It builds on existing work on technicality (Wignell et al. 1993; Martin 2017a) and bonding icons (Stenglin 2004), describing the complementary processes of technicalising and iconising attitudinal meanings through what will be called distilling and instilling. It consolidates this into a typology of highly condensed meanings that ‘do the heavy lifting’ of building fields and communities.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectsex educationen_AU
dc.subjectSystemic Functional Linguisticsen_AU
dc.subjecttechnicalisationen_AU
dc.subjecticonisationen_AU
dc.subjectconsenten_AU
dc.subjectrespecten_AU
dc.titleWith respect to consent: The language of sex educationen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Art, Communication and Englishen_AU
usyd.departmentDepartment of Linguisticsen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorMartin, James


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.