Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLegood Ren_AU
dc.contributor.authorSmith MAen_AU
dc.contributor.authorLew JBen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWalker Ren_AU
dc.contributor.authorMoss Sen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKitchener Hen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPatnick Jen_AU
dc.contributor.authorCanfell Ken_AU
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30927
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). DESIGN: Economic analysis using a Markov modelling approach to combine cost and epidemiological data from the NHS Sentinel Sites Study with data from previous studies of post-treatment recurrence rates. SETTING: English NHS Cervical Cancer Screening Programme. INTERVENTIONS: Management guidelines after treatment of CIN involving annual cytology follow-up for 10 years, compared with alternative protocols using the human papillomavirus test to reduce the amount of post-treatment surveillance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cases of underlying CIN3+ averted at 10 years and costs per 1000 women treated. RESULTS: Model predictions indicated that, at observed levels of compliance with post-treatment recommendations, management with only cytological follow-up would result in 29 residual cases of recurrent CIN3+ by 10 years and would cost pound358,222 (euro440,426; $574,910) (discounted) per 1000 women treated. Implementation of human papillomavirus test of cure in cytologically negative women according to the sentinel sites protocol would avert an additional 8.4 cases of CIN 3+ and reduce costs by pound9388 per 1000 women treated. CONCLUSIONS: Human papillomavirus test of cure would be more effective and would be cost saving compared with cytology only follow-up. The results of this evaluation support the full scale implementation of human papillomavirus test of cure after treatment of CIN within the NHS Cervical Screening Programmeen_AU
dc.publisherBMJen_AU
dc.subjectanalysisen_AU
dc.subjectEarly Detection of Canceren_AU
dc.subjecteconomicsen_AU
dc.subjectGuidelinesen_AU
dc.subjectHealth Servicesen_AU
dc.subjectHealth Services Researchen_AU
dc.subjectHumansen_AU
dc.subjectMarkov Chainsen_AU
dc.subjectMass Screeningen_AU
dc.subjectcanceren_AU
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_AU
dc.subjectModels,Theoreticalen_AU
dc.subjectNeoplasm Recurrence,Localen_AU
dc.subjectPapillomavirus Infectionsen_AU
dc.subjectPatient Complianceen_AU
dc.subjectscreeningen_AU
dc.subjectSentinel Surveillanceen_AU
dc.subjecttherapyen_AU
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_AU
dc.subjectUterine Cervical Neoplasmsen_AU
dc.subjectvirologyen_AU
dc.subjectCervical Intraepithelial Neoplasiaen_AU
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen_AU
dc.subjectdiagnosisen_AU
dc.subjectdrug therapyen_AU
dc.subject.otherCancer Type - Cervical Canceren_AU
dc.subject.otherCancer Control, Survivorship, and Outcomes Research - Health Services, Economic and Health Policy Analysesen_AU
dc.titleCost effectiveness of human papillomavirus test of cure after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: economic analysis from NHS Sentinel Sites Studyen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmj.e7086
dc.relation.otherThe study was funded by the NHS Cancer Screening Programme. KC was supported by a NHMRC Fellowship (GNT1007994)en_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.