Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSáez-Benito Len_AU
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Llimos Fen_AU
dc.contributor.authorFeletto Een_AU
dc.contributor.authorGastelurrutia Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Martinez Fen_AU
dc.contributor.authorBenrimoj Jen_AU
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30733
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPSs) encompass a variety of pharmacists' interventions to optimise pharmacotherapy. The clinical effectiveness of CPSs for aged patients remains controversial. Objective: to analyse and describe the evidence of the clinical effectiveness of CPSs in aged patients by means of performing a systematic review of systematic reviews. Methods: using the recommended methodology by Cochrane, a search was undertaken for systematic reviews of the clinical effectiveness of CPSs in MEDLINE, EMBASE, DOAJ, SCIELO and COCHRANE LIBRARY. Reviews were assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument. Quality of the evidence in the reviews was ranked using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: a total of 14 systematic reviews and one meta-analysis were analysed. The overall quality of the reviews was moderate. High and moderate strength of evidence was found for the positive effect of certain CPSs on reducing the number and improving the appropriateness of medicines. There was conflicting evidence of the effect on adherence. There was limited evidence of high and moderate strength on clinical outcomes. No positive evidence was found on mortality, hospitalisations, functional capacity and cognitive function. No systematic reviews reported the effect on the level of control of health problems. Conclusions: certain types of CPSs reduce the number of medicines and improve the appropriateness of prescriptions. Longer follow-up periods and/or the use of surrogate clinical variables measuring the short-term impact are required to demonstrate the effect on clinical outcomes.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is part of a PhD undertaken by a student sponsored by Abbott Laboratories but they did not commission nor play any role in the research.
dc.publisherAge Ageingen_AU
dc.titleEvidence of the clinical effectiveness of cognitive pharmaceutical services for aged patientsen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ageing/aft045


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.