Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaili Pen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMicheli Aen_AU
dc.contributor.authorDe Angelis Ren_AU
dc.contributor.authorWeir HKen_AU
dc.contributor.authorFrancisci Sen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSantaquilani Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorHakulinen Ten_AU
dc.contributor.authorQuaresmas Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorColeman MPen_AU
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30354
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The CONCORD study compares population-based relative survival from cancer using data from cancer registries in five continents. To estimate relative survival, general mortality life tables are required. Available statistics are incomplete, so various approaches are used to construct complete life tables. This article outlines how the life tables were constructed for CONCORD; it compares life expectancy at birth between 101 populations covered by cancer registries in 31 countries and compares the impact of two approaches to the deployment of life tables in relative survival analysis. METHODS: The CONCORD approach, using specific mathematical methods, produced complete (single-year-of-age) life tables by sex, cancer registry area, calendar year (1990-1999) and race (only in the USA). In order to study the impact of different approaches, we compared relative survival in the USA using the US national life table, centered on the relevant census years, and the CONCORD approach. We estimated relative survival in each American participating cancer registry for patients diagnosed with breast (women), colorectal or prostate cancer during 1990-1994 and followed up to 1999. RESULTS: Average life expectancy at birth during 1990-1999 varied in CONCORD cancer registry areas from 64 to 78 years in males and from 71 to 84 years in females. It increased during the 1990s more in men than in women. In the USA, it was lower in blacks than in whites. Relative survival in American populations was lower with the CONCORD approach, which incorporates trends and geographic variation in background mortality, than with the USA census life tables. CONCLUSIONS: International variation in background mortality by geographic area, calendar time, race, age and sex is wide. We suggest that in international comparisons of cancer relative survival, complete life tables that are specific for cancer registry area, calendar year and race should be useden_AU
dc.publisherTumorien_AU
dc.subjectAfrican Americansen_AU
dc.subjectHumansen_AU
dc.subjectItalyen_AU
dc.subjectLife Expectancyen_AU
dc.subjectLife Tablesen_AU
dc.subjectMaleen_AU
dc.subjectmethodsen_AU
dc.subjectmortalityen_AU
dc.subjectMulticenter Studiesen_AU
dc.subjectNeoplasmsen_AU
dc.subjectprostateen_AU
dc.subjectanalysisen_AU
dc.subjectRegistriesen_AU
dc.subjectrelative survivalen_AU
dc.subjectResearchen_AU
dc.subjectSEER Programen_AU
dc.subjectStatisticsen_AU
dc.subjectstatistics & numerical dataen_AU
dc.subjectsurvivalen_AU
dc.subjectSurvival Analysisen_AU
dc.subjectSurvival Rateen_AU
dc.subjecttrendsen_AU
dc.subjectbreasten_AU
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_AU
dc.subjectWomenen_AU
dc.subjectWorld Healthen_AU
dc.subjectcanceren_AU
dc.subjectcancer registryen_AU
dc.subjectComparative Studyen_AU
dc.subjectepidemiologyen_AU
dc.subjectEuropean Continental Ancestry Groupen_AU
dc.subjectFemaleen_AU
dc.subject.otherCancer Control, Survivorship, and Outcomes Research - Surveillanceen_AU
dc.titleLife tables for world-wide comparison of relative survival for cancer (CONCORD study)en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.