Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaili Pen
dc.contributor.authorMicheli Aen
dc.contributor.authorDe Angelis Ren
dc.contributor.authorWeir HKen
dc.contributor.authorFrancisci Sen
dc.contributor.authorSantaquilani Men
dc.contributor.authorHakulinen Ten
dc.contributor.authorQuaresmas Men
dc.contributor.authorColeman MPen
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30354
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The CONCORD study compares population-based relative survival from cancer using data from cancer registries in five continents. To estimate relative survival, general mortality life tables are required. Available statistics are incomplete, so various approaches are used to construct complete life tables. This article outlines how the life tables were constructed for CONCORD; it compares life expectancy at birth between 101 populations covered by cancer registries in 31 countries and compares the impact of two approaches to the deployment of life tables in relative survival analysis. METHODS: The CONCORD approach, using specific mathematical methods, produced complete (single-year-of-age) life tables by sex, cancer registry area, calendar year (1990-1999) and race (only in the USA). In order to study the impact of different approaches, we compared relative survival in the USA using the US national life table, centered on the relevant census years, and the CONCORD approach. We estimated relative survival in each American participating cancer registry for patients diagnosed with breast (women), colorectal or prostate cancer during 1990-1994 and followed up to 1999. RESULTS: Average life expectancy at birth during 1990-1999 varied in CONCORD cancer registry areas from 64 to 78 years in males and from 71 to 84 years in females. It increased during the 1990s more in men than in women. In the USA, it was lower in blacks than in whites. Relative survival in American populations was lower with the CONCORD approach, which incorporates trends and geographic variation in background mortality, than with the USA census life tables. CONCLUSIONS: International variation in background mortality by geographic area, calendar time, race, age and sex is wide. We suggest that in international comparisons of cancer relative survival, complete life tables that are specific for cancer registry area, calendar year and race should be useden
dc.publisherTumorien
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectAfrican Americansen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectItalyen
dc.subjectLife Expectancyen
dc.subjectLife Tablesen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectmethodsen
dc.subjectmortalityen
dc.subjectMulticenter Studiesen
dc.subjectNeoplasmsen
dc.subjectprostateen
dc.subjectanalysisen
dc.subjectRegistriesen
dc.subjectrelative survivalen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectSEER Programen
dc.subjectStatisticsen
dc.subjectstatistics & numerical dataen
dc.subjectsurvivalen
dc.subjectSurvival Analysisen
dc.subjectSurvival Rateen
dc.subjecttrendsen
dc.subjectbreasten
dc.subjectUnited Statesen
dc.subjectWomenen
dc.subjectWorld Healthen
dc.subjectcanceren
dc.subjectcancer registryen
dc.subjectComparative Studyen
dc.subjectepidemiologyen
dc.subjectEuropean Continental Ancestry Groupen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subject.otherCancer Control, Survivorship, and Outcomes Research - Surveillanceen
dc.titleLife tables for world-wide comparison of relative survival for cancer (CONCORD study)en
dc.typeArticleen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, The Daffodil Centreen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.