Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNikolajevic-Sarunac Jen
dc.contributor.authorHenry DAen
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell DLen
dc.contributor.authorRobertson Jen
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30339
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To determine whether the way in which information on benefits and harms of long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is presented influences family physicians' intentions to prescribe this treatment. DESIGN: Family physicians were randomized to receive information on treatment outcomes expressed in relative terms, or as the number needing to be treated (NNT) with HRT to prevent or cause an event. A control group received no information. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians practicing in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia. INTERVENTION: Estimates of the impact of long-term HRT on risk of coronary events, hip fractures, and breast cancer were summarized as relative (proportional) decreases or increases in risk, or as NNT. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intention to prescribe HRT for seven hypothetical patients was measured on Likert scales. Of 389 family physicians working in the Hunter Valley, 243 completed the baseline survey and 215 participated in the randomized trial. Baseline intention to prescribe varied across patients-it was highest in the presence of risk factors for hip fracture, but coexisting risk factors for breast cancer had a strong negative influence. Overall, a larger proportion of subjects receiving information expressed as NNT had reduced intentions, and a smaller proportion had increased intentions to prescribe HRT than those receiving the information expressed in relative terms, or the control group. However, the differences were small and only reached statistical significance for three hypothetical patients. Framing effects were minimal when the hypothetical patient had coexisting risk factors for breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Information framing had some effect on family physicians' intentions to prescribe HRT, but the effects were smaller than those previously reported, and they were modified by the presence of serious potential adverse treatment effectsen
dc.publisherJournal of General Internal Medicineen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectHip Fracturesen
dc.subjectHormone Replacement Therapyen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectIntentionen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectMyocardial Infarctionen
dc.subjectNew South Walesen
dc.subjectPhysician's Practice Patternsen
dc.subjectPhysicians,Familyen
dc.subjectbreasten
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen
dc.subjectResearch Support,Non-U.S.Gov'ten
dc.subjectRisken
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen
dc.subjectstatistics & numerical dataen
dc.subjecttherapyen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectutilizationen
dc.subjectWalesen
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasmsen
dc.subjectcanceren
dc.subjectDesignen
dc.subjectepidemiologyen
dc.subjectFamilyen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge,Attitudes,Practiceen
dc.titleEffects of information framing on the intentions of family physicians to prescribe long-term hormone replacement therapyen
dc.typeArticleen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.