Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoung JMen
dc.contributor.authorSolomon MJen
dc.contributor.authorLeong DCen
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong Ken
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell DLen
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong BKen
dc.contributor.authorSpigelman ADen
dc.contributor.authorAckland Sen
dc.contributor.authorChapuis Pen
dc.contributor.authorKneebone ABen
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30335
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To investigate predictors of evidence-based surgical care in a population-based sample of patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND SETTING: Prospective audit of all new patients with colorectal cancer reported to the New South Wales Central Cancer Registry between 1 February 2000 and 31 January 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Concordance with seven guidelines from the 1999 Australian evidence-based guidelines for colorectal cancer; predictors of guideline concordance; the mean proportion of relevant guidelines followed for individual patients. RESULTS: Questionnaires were received for 3095 patients (91.6%). Between 0 and 100% of relevant guidelines were followed for individual patients (median, 67%). Concordance with individual guidelines varied considerably. Patient age independently predicted non-concordance with guidelines for adjuvant therapy and preoperative radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was more likely if a patient with node-positive colon cancer was treated in a metropolitan hospital or by a general surgeon. Surgeons with a high caseload or specialty in colorectal cancer were more likely to perform colonic pouch reconstruction, prescribe thromboembolism or antibiotic prophylaxis, and were less likely to refer patients with high-risk rectal cancer for adjuvant radiotherapy. Bowel preparation was less likely among older patients and in high-caseload hospitals. CONCLUSION: Effective strategies to fully implement national colorectal cancer guidelines are needed. In particular, increasing the use of appropriate adjuvant therapy should be a priority, especially among older peopleen
dc.publisherMedical Journal of Australiaen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectDesignen
dc.subjectdrug therapyen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectGuideline Adherenceen
dc.subjectGuidelinesen
dc.subjectHospitalsen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMeta-Analysisen
dc.subjectmethodsen
dc.subjectAged,80 and overen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectMulticenter Studiesen
dc.subjectNew South Walesen
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment (Health Care)en
dc.subjectPatient Complianceen
dc.subjectPatterns of careen
dc.subjectPopulation Surveillanceen
dc.subjectPractice Guidelinesen
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agentsen
dc.subjectradiotherapyen
dc.subjectRadiotherapy,Adjuvanten
dc.subjectRegistriesen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen
dc.subjectSocieties,Medicalen
dc.subjectstandardsen
dc.subjectsurgeryen
dc.subjecttherapeutic useen
dc.subjecttherapyen
dc.subjectcanceren
dc.subjectWalesen
dc.subjectcancer registryen
dc.subjectColectomyen
dc.subjectColonen
dc.subjectcolorectal canceren
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasmsen
dc.subject.otherCancer Control, Survivorship, and Outcomes Research - Health Services, Economic and Health Policy Analysesen
dc.subject.otherTreatment - Systemic Therapies – Clinical Applicationsen
dc.subject.otherCancer Type - Bowel & Colorectal Canceren
dc.titleConcordance with national guidelines for colorectal cancer care in New South Wales: a population-based patterns of care studyen
dc.typeArticleen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.