Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarinovich, M Luke
dc.contributor.authorWylie, Elizabeth Jane
dc.contributor.authorLotter, William
dc.contributor.authorPearce, Alison
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Stacy M
dc.contributor.authorLund, Helen
dc.contributor.authorWaddell, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jiye G
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Gavin F
dc.contributor.authorLee, Christoph I
dc.contributor.authorZackrisson, Sophia
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Meagan
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T02:47:47Z
dc.date.available2023-03-20T02:47:47Z
dc.date.issued2022en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30244
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for interpreting mammograms have the potential to improve the effectiveness of population breast cancer screening programmes if they can detect cancers, including interval cancers, without contributing substantially to overdiagnosis. Studies suggesting that AI has comparable or greater accuracy than radiologists commonly employ ‘enriched’ datasets in which cancer prevalence is higher than in population screening. Routine screening outcome metrics (cancer detection and recall rates) cannot be estimated from these datasets, and accuracy estimates may be subject to spectrum bias which limits generalisabilty to real-world screening. We aim to address these limitations by comparing the accuracy of AI and radiologists in a cohort of consecutive of women attending a real-world population breast cancer screening programme. Methods and analysis A retrospective, consecutive cohort of digital mammography screens from 109 000 distinct women was assembled from BreastScreen WA (BSWA), Western Australia’s biennial population screening programme, from November 2016 to December 2017. The cohort includes 761 screen-detected and 235 interval cancers. Descriptive characteristics and results of radiologist double-reading will be extracted from BSWA outcomes data collection. Mammograms will be reinterpreted by a commercial AI algorithm (DeepHealth). AI accuracy will be compared with that of radiologist single-reading based on the difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Cancer detection and recall rates for combined AI–radiologist reading will be estimated by pairing the first radiologist read per screen with the AI algorithm, and compared with estimates for radiologist double-reading.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Journal of Australiaen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectbreast imagingen_AU
dc.subjectbreast tumoursen_AU
dc.subjectdiagnostic radiologyen_AU
dc.titleArtificial intelligence (AI) to enhance breast cancer screening: protocol for population-based cohort study of cancer detectionen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054005
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.relation.nhmrc1194410
dc.relation.nhmrc1181960
dc.relation.nhmrc1099655
dc.relation.nhmrc1173991
dc.relation.otherNational Breast Cancer Foundation Investigator Initiated Research Scheme grant (IIRS-20-011)
dc.relation.otherResearch Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (#262700)
dc.relation.otherNational Cancer Institute (R37 CA240403)
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.citation.volume12en_AU
usyd.citation.issue1en_AU
usyd.citation.spagee054005en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.