Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarinovich, M Luke
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Christobel
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Gavin
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T04:57:53Z
dc.date.available2023-03-13T04:57:53Z
dc.date.issued2023en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30196
dc.description.abstractBackground A 2014 SSO-ASTRO guideline on surgical margins aimed to reduce unnecessary reoperation after breast conserving surgery (BCS). We investigate whether publication of the guideline was associated with a reduction in reoperation in Western Australia (WA). Methods In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, cases of newly-diagnosed breast cancer were identified from the WA Cancer Registry. Linkage to the Hospital Morbidity Data Collection identified index BCS for invasive cancer between January 2009 and June 2018 (N = 8059) and reoperation within 90 days. Pre-guideline (2009–2013) and post-guideline (2014–2018) reoperation proportions were compared, and temporal trends were estimated with generalised linear regression. Results The pre-guideline reoperation proportion was 25.8% compared with 21.7% post-guideline (difference −4.0% [95% CI —5.9, −2.2, p < 0.001], odds ratio [OR] 0.80 [95% CI 0.72, 0.89, p < 0.001]). Absolute reductions were similar for repeat BCS (16.3% versus 14.6%; difference −1.8% [95% CI —3.4, −0.2, p = 0.03]) and conversion to mastectomy (9.4% versus 7.2%; difference −2.2% [95% CI —3.4, −1.0, p < 0.001]). Over the study period, there was an annual absolute change in reoperation of −0.8% (95% CI —1.2, −0.5, p < 0.001). Accounting for this linear trend, the difference in reoperation between time periods was −0.5% (95% CI —4.3, 3.3; p = 0.81), reflecting a non-significant reduction in conversion to mastectomy. Conclusions Comparisons of pre- versus post-guideline time periods in WA showed reductions in reoperation that were similar to international estimates; however, an annual decline in reoperation predated the guideline. Analyses that do not account for temporal trends are likely to overestimate changes in reoperation associated with the guideline.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofThe Breasten_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectBreast neoplasmsen_AU
dc.subjectBreast-conserving surgeryen_AU
dc.subjectHealth care evaluation mechanismsen_AU
dc.subjectPractice guidelinesen_AU
dc.titleRates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guidelineen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.013
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.relation.nhmrc1099655
dc.relation.nhmrc1173991
dc.relation.nhmrc1194410
dc.relation.otherRapid Applied Research Translation program, and a National Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) Investigator Initiated Research Scheme grant (IIRS-20-011)
dc.relation.otherNational Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) Chair in Breast Cancer Prevention program (EC-21-001)
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.