Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarinovich, M Luke
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Christobel
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Gavin
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T04:57:53Z
dc.date.available2023-03-13T04:57:53Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30196
dc.description.abstractBackground A 2014 SSO-ASTRO guideline on surgical margins aimed to reduce unnecessary reoperation after breast conserving surgery (BCS). We investigate whether publication of the guideline was associated with a reduction in reoperation in Western Australia (WA). Methods In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, cases of newly-diagnosed breast cancer were identified from the WA Cancer Registry. Linkage to the Hospital Morbidity Data Collection identified index BCS for invasive cancer between January 2009 and June 2018 (N = 8059) and reoperation within 90 days. Pre-guideline (2009–2013) and post-guideline (2014–2018) reoperation proportions were compared, and temporal trends were estimated with generalised linear regression. Results The pre-guideline reoperation proportion was 25.8% compared with 21.7% post-guideline (difference −4.0% [95% CI —5.9, −2.2, p < 0.001], odds ratio [OR] 0.80 [95% CI 0.72, 0.89, p < 0.001]). Absolute reductions were similar for repeat BCS (16.3% versus 14.6%; difference −1.8% [95% CI —3.4, −0.2, p = 0.03]) and conversion to mastectomy (9.4% versus 7.2%; difference −2.2% [95% CI —3.4, −1.0, p < 0.001]). Over the study period, there was an annual absolute change in reoperation of −0.8% (95% CI —1.2, −0.5, p < 0.001). Accounting for this linear trend, the difference in reoperation between time periods was −0.5% (95% CI —4.3, 3.3; p = 0.81), reflecting a non-significant reduction in conversion to mastectomy. Conclusions Comparisons of pre- versus post-guideline time periods in WA showed reductions in reoperation that were similar to international estimates; however, an annual decline in reoperation predated the guideline. Analyses that do not account for temporal trends are likely to overestimate changes in reoperation associated with the guideline.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofThe Breasten
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en
dc.subjectBreast neoplasmsen
dc.subjectBreast-conserving surgeryen
dc.subjectHealth care evaluation mechanismsen
dc.subjectPractice guidelinesen
dc.titleRates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guidelineen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.013
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
dc.relation.nhmrc1099655
dc.relation.nhmrc1173991
dc.relation.nhmrc1194410
dc.relation.otherRapid Applied Research Translation program, and a National Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) Investigator Initiated Research Scheme grant (IIRS-20-011)
dc.relation.otherNational Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) Chair in Breast Cancer Prevention program (EC-21-001)
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.