Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNickel, Brooke
dc.contributor.authorCopp, Tessa
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Meagan
dc.contributor.authorFarber, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T04:19:30Z
dc.date.available2023-03-07T04:19:30Z
dc.date.issued2021en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30170
dc.description.abstractBackground: In the last decade, there has been an unprecedented amount of advocacy and attention surrounding the issue of breast density (BD) in relation to mammography screening. It is largely unknown what impact notifying women of their BD has had on clinical practice for PCPs. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence from existing studies to understand the impact of BD notification on primary care practitioners' (PCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and practice implications. Methods: Empirical studies were identified through relevant database searches (database inception to May 2020). Two authors evaluated the eligibility of studies, extracted and crosschecked data, and assessed the risk of bias. Results were synthesized in a narrative form. Results: Six studies of the 232 titles identified and screened were included. All studies were undertaken in the United States, with five conducted postlegislation in their respective states, and one study conducted in states that were both prelegislation and postlegislation. Five studies were quantitative, including four cross-sectional surveys, and one study was qualitative. Findings consistently demonstrated PCPs' overall lack of knowledge about BD, low level of comfort in discussing and managing patients in relation to dense breasts, and limited consensus on the most appropriate approach for managing women with dense breasts, particularly in relation to supplemental screening. Conclusions: This review highlights important gaps in PCPs' understanding of BD and confidence in having discussions with women about the implications of dense breasts. It identifies the need for high-quality research and the development of evidence-based guidelines to better support PCPs.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherMary Ann Lieberten_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Women's Healthen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectbreast densityen_AU
dc.subjectmammographyen_AU
dc.subjectnotificationen_AU
dc.subjectlegislationen_AU
dc.subjectprimary careen_AU
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_AU
dc.titleBreast Density Notification: A Systematic Review of the Impact on Primary Care Practitionersen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/jwh.2020.8898
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten_AU
dc.relation.nhmrc1121110
dc.relation.nhmrc1194410
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.citation.volume30en_AU
usyd.citation.issue10en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.