Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNickel, Brooke
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Christobel
dc.contributor.authorSpillane, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorRutherford, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Ann
dc.contributor.authorBarratt, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorStuart, Kirsty
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Geraldine
dc.contributor.authorHersch, Jolyn
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T05:26:41Z
dc.date.available2023-02-27T05:26:41Z
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30125
dc.description.abstractBackground Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an in-situ (pre-cancerous) breast malignancy whereby malignant cells are contained within the basement membrane of the breast ducts. Increasing awareness that some low-risk forms of DCIS might remain indolent for many years has led to concern about overtreatment, with at least 3 clinical trials underway internationally assessing the safety of active monitoring for low-risk DCIS. This study aimed to understand healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) views on the management options for patients with DCIS. Methods Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with HCPs involved in the diagnosis and management of DCIS in Australia and New Zealand. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using Framework Analysis method. Results Twenty-six HCPs including 10 breast surgeons, 3 breast physicians, 6 radiation oncologists, and 7 breast care nurses participated. There was a strong overall consensus that DCIS requires active treatment. HCPs generally felt uncomfortable recommending active monitoring as a management option for low-risk DCIS as they viewed this as outside current standard care. Overall, HCPs felt that active monitoring was an unproven strategy in need of an evidence base; however, many acknowledged that active monitoring for low-risk DCIS could be appropriate for patients with significant co-morbidities or limited life expectancy. They believed that most patients would opt for surgery wherever possible. Conclusions This study highlights the important need for robust randomised controlled trial data about active monitoring for women with low-risk DCIS, to provide HCPs with confidence in their management recommendations and decision-making.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherScience Directen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Breasten
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectDuctal carcinoma in situen
dc.subjectManagementen
dc.subjectActive monitoringen
dc.subjectOvertreatmenten
dc.subjectQualitativeen
dc.titleViews of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview studyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.002
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
dc.relation.arc1104136
dc.relation.nhmrc1121110
dc.relation.nhmrc1112509
dc.relation.otherNational Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) Cancer Research Leadership Fellowship
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.citation.volume54en
usyd.citation.spage99en
usyd.citation.epage105en
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.