Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMariscotti, G
dc.contributor.authorDurando, M
dc.contributor.authorTagliafico, A
dc.contributor.authorCampanino, P.P.
dc.contributor.authorBosco, D
dc.contributor.authorCasella, C
dc.contributor.authorBussone, R
dc.contributor.authorAla, A
dc.contributor.authorCastellano, I
dc.contributor.authorSapino, A
dc.contributor.authorBergamasco, L
dc.contributor.authorFonio, P
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T05:09:05Z
dc.date.available2023-02-27T05:09:05Z
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/30120
dc.description.abstractPurpose To compare the rates of mastectomy and re-operation after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) among patients who had different pre-operative multi-modality imaging, hence identifying significant predictors of mastectomy and re-operations within each group. Method Retrospective study of consecutive patients with primary breast cancer treated January 2010 – December 2016, divided in 3 groups, undergoing pre-operative local staging respectively with conventional imaging modalities only (2D mammography, ultrasound (US)), conventional imaging and tomosynthesis (DBT) and/or MRI. The primary outcome was identification of significant predictors of surgical outcomes, within each group. Study variables examined in univariate analysis were age, lesion dimension, breast density, multifocality, tumor size, histology, and if associated with outcomes they were included in binary logistic regression analysis. Results Amongst 1547 patients, patient and tumor characteristics differed across the three groups, as did mastectomy rates which were 18 % (102/562) for 2D + US, 36 % (154/428) for 2D + DBT + US, 45 % (250/557) for 2D+/-DBT + US + MRI(p < 0.001). Variables strongly associated with mastectomy were larger lesions and multifocality (as was multi-modality group). Re-operation rate showed an opposite trend: 12.2 % (56/459) for 2D + US, 8 % (22/272) for 2D + DBT + US, 6.5 % (20/306) for 2D+/-DBT + US + MRI. Re-operation rate for 2D+/-DBT + US + MRI was lower than for 2D + US (p = 0.01) but similar to 2D + DBT + US (p = 0.58). Patients who had 2D + US and re-operations had significantly larger lesions, more underestimation, higher proportion of invasive carcinoma with in-situ component than those who did not require re-operation. Conclusions Patients who had larger tumors and multifocal disease were more frequently staged by adding DBT and/or MRI to conventional imaging (mammography and US) which was associated with more extensive surgical treatment but lower reoperation rates.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Radiologyen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en
dc.subjectMastectomy ratesen
dc.subjectRe-operation ratesen
dc.subjectPreoperative breast MRIen
dc.subjectPreoperative multimodality imagingen
dc.subjectBreast canceren
dc.titlePreoperative breast cancer staging with multi-modality imaging and surgical outcomesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108766
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.citation.volume122en
usyd.citation.issue108766en
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.