Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVirtue, John Garry
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-09T04:07:55Z
dc.date.available2022-03-09T04:07:55Z
dc.date.issued1997en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/27629
dc.description.abstractTea tree, Melaleuca alternifolia, is an evergreen tree, native to freshwater swamp and creek margins on the mid-eastem coast of Australia. The leaf essential oil has antimicrobial properties, and is used commercially in various health care products, toiletries and cosmetics. Plantation production has been centred on the north coast of New South Wales. Tea trees are planted as seedlings and shoots are first harvested to near-ground level at 12-24 months after planting. Tea tree oil is obtained from the shoot material by steam distillation Tea tree readily coppices, and shoot regrowth from out stumps is harvested on an annual basis. Weed control in tea tree plantations was considered an agronomic research priority. A research project was conducted that investigated the effects, mechanisms and management of weed interference in the annual regrowth cycle of plantation tea tree. Industry practices at the commencement of the project were recorded in a survey of managers of 28 tea tree plantations in 1992. Managers were interviewed regarding their general plantation management and specific weed control activities. There was much diversity between plantations, particularly in relation to plantation area, planting layout and tree spacings. Weed control methods used included herbicides, mechanical cultivation, hand-hoeing, mowing, grazing, green manure crops, mulches, cover crops and burning. Climatic and soil conditions of plantations were favourable for growth of herbaceous weeds. The majority of plantation managers considered weeds to be a major limit to tea tree oil production, and half were satisfied with their current weed control techniques (for plantations of > 10 ha). Herbicides and cultivation were the most widely used weed control methods. Grazing was rated poorly in terms of weed control, and mowing and hand-hoeing were rated poorly in terms of cost-effectiveness.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectMelaleuca alternifolia -- Growthen_AU
dc.subjectWeeds -- Controlen_AU
dc.titleWeed interference in the annual regrowth cycle of plantation tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia)en_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.departmentDepartment of Crop Sciencesen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.