Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorrow, Monica
dc.contributor.authorVan Zee, Kimberly J.
dc.contributor.authorSolin, Lawrence J.
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.contributor.authorChavez-MacGregor, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Jay R.
dc.contributor.authorHorton, Janet
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Shelley
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Peggy L.
dc.contributor.authorMarinovich, Michael Luke
dc.contributor.authorSchnitt, Stuart J.
dc.contributor.authorWapnir, Irene
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Meena S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T22:23:44Z
dc.date.available2021-11-25T22:23:44Z
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26957
dc.description.abstractBackground Controversy exists regarding the optimal negative margin width for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation (WBRT). Methods A multidisciplinary consensus panel used a meta-analysis of margin width and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) from a systematic review of 20 studies including 7883 patients and other published literature as the evidence base for consensus. Results Negative margins halve the risk of IBTR compared with positive margins defined as ink on DCIS. A 2 mm margin minimizes the risk of IBTR compared with smaller negative margins. More widely clear margins do not significantly decrease IBTR compared with 2 mm margins. Negative margins less than 2 mm alone are not an indication for mastectomy, and factors known to impact rates of IBTR should be considered in determining the need for re-excision. Conclusion The use of a 2 mm margin as the standard for an adequate margin in DCIS treated with WBRT is associated with low rates of IBTR and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcome, and decrease health care costs. Clinical judgment should be used in determining the need for further surgery in patients with negative margins < 2 mm.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncologyen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Oncologyen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasmsen
dc.subjectradiotherapyen
dc.subjectBreast surgeryen
dc.subjectBreast therapyen
dc.subjectCarcinomaen
dc.subjectIntraductalen
dc.subjectNoninfiltratingen
dc.titleSociety of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesisen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3573
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.citation.volume34en
usyd.citation.issue33en
usyd.citation.spage4040en
usyd.citation.epage4046en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.