Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Houssami, Nehmat | |
dc.contributor.author | Bernardi, Daniela | |
dc.contributor.author | Pellegrini, Marco | |
dc.contributor.author | Valentini, Marvi | |
dc.contributor.author | Fanto, Carmine | |
dc.contributor.author | Ostillio, Livio | |
dc.contributor.author | Tuttobene, Paolina | |
dc.contributor.author | Luparia, Andrea | |
dc.contributor.author | Macaskill, Petra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-25T11:35:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-25T11:35:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/26953 | |
dc.description.abstract | Most population breast cancer (BC) screening programs use double-reading of 2D-mammography. We recently reported the screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography-2 (STORM-2) trial, showing that double-read tomosynthesis (pseudo-3D-mammography) detected more BC than double-read 2D-mammography. In this study, we compare screen-detection measures for single-reading of 3D-mammography with those for double-reading of 2D-mammography, to inform screening practice. This is a secondary analysis based on STORM-2 which prospectively compared 3D-mammography and 2D-mammography in sequential screen-readings. Asymptomatic women ≥49 years who attended population-based screening (Trento, 2013–2015) were recruited. Participants recalled at any screen-read from parallel double-reading arms underwent further testing and/or biopsy. Single-reading of 3D-mammography, integrated with acquired or synthetized 2D-mammograms, was compared to double-reading of 2D-mammograhy alone for screen-detection measures: number of detected BCs, cancer detection rate (CDR), number and percentage of false-positive recall (FPR). Paired binary data were compared using McNemar’s test. | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cancer Epidemiology | en_AU |
dc.rights | Copyright All Rights Reserved | en_AU |
dc.subject | Breast cancer screening | en_AU |
dc.subject | Digital breast tomosynthesis | en_AU |
dc.subject | Mammography | en_AU |
dc.subject | Population screening | en_AU |
dc.subject | Screen-reading | en_AU |
dc.title | Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial. | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 1117 Public Health and Health Services | en_AU |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.canep.2017.01.008 | |
usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Health | en_AU |
usyd.citation.volume | 47 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.spage | 94 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.epage | 99 | en_AU |
workflow.metadata.only | No | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections