Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBernardi, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T04:58:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-11T04:58:02Z
dc.date.issued2017en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26864
dc.description.abstractThe prospective ‘screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography-2 (STORM-2)’ trial compared mammography screen-reading strategies and showed that each of integrated 2D/3D-mammography or 2Dsynthetic/3D-mammography detected significantly more breast cancers than 2D-mammography alone. This short report describes 13 (from 90) cancers detected in only one of two parallel double-reading arms implemented in STORM-2. Amongst this subset of cases, the majority was invasive cancer ≤16 mm, mostly depicted as irregular masses or distortions. Furthermore, most were detected at 3D-mammography only and predominantly by one reader from double-reading pairs, highlighting that 3D-mammography may enable detection of cancers that are challenging to perceive at routine screening.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofThe Breasten_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectDigital breast tomosynthesisen_AU
dc.subjectMammographyen_AU
dc.subjectPopulation screeningen_AU
dc.titleBreast cancers detected in only one of two arms of a tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) population screening trial (STORM-2)en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesisen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.breast.2017.01.005
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.citation.volume32en_AU
usyd.citation.spage98en_AU
usyd.citation.epage101en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.