Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBernardi, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T04:58:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-11T04:58:02Z
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26864
dc.description.abstractThe prospective ‘screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography-2 (STORM-2)’ trial compared mammography screen-reading strategies and showed that each of integrated 2D/3D-mammography or 2Dsynthetic/3D-mammography detected significantly more breast cancers than 2D-mammography alone. This short report describes 13 (from 90) cancers detected in only one of two parallel double-reading arms implemented in STORM-2. Amongst this subset of cases, the majority was invasive cancer ≤16 mm, mostly depicted as irregular masses or distortions. Furthermore, most were detected at 3D-mammography only and predominantly by one reader from double-reading pairs, highlighting that 3D-mammography may enable detection of cancers that are challenging to perceive at routine screening.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofThe Breasten
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectDigital breast tomosynthesisen
dc.subjectMammographyen
dc.subjectPopulation screeningen
dc.titleBreast cancers detected in only one of two arms of a tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) population screening trial (STORM-2)en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesisen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.breast.2017.01.005
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.citation.volume32en
usyd.citation.spage98en
usyd.citation.epage101en
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.