Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Mariscotti, Giovanna | |
dc.contributor.author | Durando, Manuela | |
dc.contributor.author | Houssami, Nehmat | |
dc.contributor.author | Fasciano, Mirella | |
dc.contributor.author | Tagliafico, Alberto | |
dc.contributor.author | Bosco, Davide | |
dc.contributor.author | Casella, Cristina | |
dc.contributor.author | Bogetti, Camilla | |
dc.contributor.author | Bergamasco, Laura | |
dc.contributor.author | Fonio, Paolo | |
dc.contributor.author | Gandini, Giovanni | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-27T21:56:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-27T21:56:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/26664 | |
dc.description.abstract | To compare the interpretive performance of synthetic mammography (SM), reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in a diagnostic setting, covering different conditions of breast density and mammographic signs. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 231 patients, who underwent FFDM and DBT (from which SM images were reconstructed) between September 2014–September 2015. The study included 250 suspicious breast lesions, all biopsy proven: 148 (59.2%) malignant and 13 (5.2%) high-risk lesions were confirmed by surgery, 89 (35.6%) benign lesions had radiological follow-up. Two breast radiologists, blinded to histology, independently reviewed all cases. Readings were performed with SM alone, then with FFDM, collecting data on: probability of malignancy for each finding, lesion conspicuity, mammographic features and dimensions of detected lesion | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Springer Link | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartof | Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | en_AU |
dc.rights | Copyright All Rights Reserved | en_AU |
dc.subject | Synthetic mammography | en_AU |
dc.subject | Full-field digital mammography | en_AU |
dc.subject | BI-RADS category assessment | en_AU |
dc.subject | Digital breast tomosynthesis | en_AU |
dc.title | Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories. | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 1117 Public Health and Health Services | en_AU |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10549-017-4458-3 | |
usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Health | en_AU |
usyd.citation.volume | 166 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.spage | 765 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.epage | 773 | en_AU |
workflow.metadata.only | Yes | en_AU |
Associated file/s
There are no files associated with this item.
Associated collections