Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCardona, Magnoliaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorDobler, Claudia Cen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKoreshe, Eyzaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHeyland, Daren Ken_AU
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Rebecca Hen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSim, Joan P Yen_AU
dc.contributor.authorClark, Justinen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPsirides, Alexen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-19T02:28:16Z
dc.date.available2021-10-19T02:28:16Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26545
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: This scoping review sought to identify objective factors to assist clinicians and policy-makers in making consistent, objective and ethically sound decisions about resource allocation when healthcare rationing is inevitable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of guidelines and tools used in ICUs, hospital wards and emergency departments on how to best allocate intensive care beds and ventilators either during routine care or developed during previous epidemics, and association with patient outcomes during and after hospitalisation. RESULTS: Eighty publications from 20 countries reporting accuracy or validity of prognostic tools/algorithms, or significant correlation between prognostic variables and clinical outcomes met our eligibility criteria: twelve pandemic guidelines/triage protocols/consensus statements, twenty-two pandemic algorithms, and 46 prognostic tools/variables from non-crisis situations. Prognostic indicators presented here can be combined to create locally-relevant triage algorithms for clinicians and policy makers deciding about allocation of ICU beds and ventilators during a pandemic. No consensus was found on the ethical issues to incorporate in the decision to admit or triage out of intensive care. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a unique reference intended as a discussion starter for clinicians and policy makers to consider formalising an objective a locally-relevant triage consensus document that enhances confidence in decision-making during healthcare rationing of critical care and ventilator resources.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_AU
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_AU
dc.titleA catalogue of tools and variables from crisis and routine care to support decision-making about allocation of intensive care beds and ventilator treatment during pandemics: Scoping reviewen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.08.001


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.