Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Dennis Glen
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T03:54:14Z
dc.date.available2021-09-29T03:54:14Z
dc.date.issued1977en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26309
dc.descriptionb17353671_v1en_AU
dc.description.abstractwhat does it mean to say that an object moves? A simple answer would be to say that an object moves when it changes its spatial location during some interval of time. However, the concept of motion is considerably more complex than this simplistic definition would imply. The subtlety of the concept of motion was evident to Zeno of Elea who proposed a set of paradoxes concerning motion some 2500 years ago. Zeno's paradoxes were not resolved until the advent of modern mathematics, particularly differential calculus (Russell, 1938, pp. 347—354). An intuitive grasp of the nature of space and time is insufficient to accurately describe the motion of objects in the real world but in the phenomenal world a simple definition‘ will suffice. Despite some shortcomings, the definition of motion adopted for this discussion is that "an object appears to move when it changes its apparent spatial location during a given interval of time".en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectMotionen_AU
dc.titleFactors influencing the perception of depth ambiguous apparent motion.en_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisMasters by Researchen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.degreeMaster of Science M.Sc.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.