Interval breast cancers in the ‘screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography’ (STORM) population-based trial.
Metadata
Show full item recordType
ArticleAuthor/s
Houssami, NehmatBernardi, Daniela
Caumo, Francesca
Brunelli, Silvia
Fanto, Carmine
Valentini, Marvi
Romanucci, Giovanna
Gentilini, Maria A.
Zorzi, Manuel
Macaskill, Petra
Abstract
The prospective ‘screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography’ (STORM) trial recruited women participating in biennial breast screening in Italy (2011–2012), and compared sequential screen-readings based on 2D-mammography alone or based on tomosynthesis (integrated 2D/3D-mammography). The STORM trial showed that tomosynthesis screen-reading significantly increased breast cancer detection compared to 2D-mammography alone. The present study completes reporting of the trial by examining interval breast cancers ascertained at two year follow-up.The prospective ‘screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography’ (STORM) trial recruited women participating in biennial breast screening in Italy (2011–2012), and compared sequential screen-readings based on 2D-mammography alone or based on tomosynthesis (integrated 2D/3D-mammography). The STORM trial showed that tomosynthesis screen-reading significantly increased breast cancer detection compared to 2D-mammography alone. The present study completes reporting of the trial by examining interval breast cancers ascertained at two year follow-up.
See less
See less
Date
2018Source title
The BreastVolume
38Publisher
ElsevierLicence
Copyright All Rights ReservedFaculty/School
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public HealthShare