Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHofvind, Solveig
dc.contributor.authorHolen, Asne S
dc.contributor.authorAase, Hildegunn S
dc.contributor.authorHoussami, Nehmat
dc.contributor.authorSebuodegard, Sofie
dc.contributor.authorMoger, Tron A
dc.contributor.authorHaldorsen, Ingrid S
dc.contributor.authorAkslen, Lars A
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T05:29:39Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T05:29:39Z
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25792
dc.description.abstractDigital breast tomosynthesis is an advancement of mammography, and has the potential to overcome limitations of standard digital mammography. This study aimed to compare first-generation digital breast tomo-synthesis including two-dimensional (2D) synthetic mammograms versus digital mammography in a population-based screening programme. BreastScreen Norway offers all women aged 50–69 years two-view (craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique) mammographic screening every 2 years and does independent double reading with consensus. We asked all 32 976 women who attended the programme in Bergen in 2016–17, to participate in this randomised, controlled trial with a parallel group design. A study-specific software was developed to allocate women to either digital breast tomosynthesis or digital mammography using a 1:1 simple randomisation method based on participants' unique national identity numbers. The interviewing radiographer did the randomisation by entering the number into the software. Randomisation was done after consent and was therefore concealed from both the women and the radiographer at the time of consent; the algorithm was not disclosed to radiographers during the recruitment period. All data needed for analyses were complete 12 months after the recruitment period ended. The primary outcome measure was screen-detected breast cancer, stratified by screening technique (ie, digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography). A log-binomial regression model was used to estimate the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography, defined as the crude risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs for screen-detected breast cancer for women screened during the recruitment period. A per-protocol approach was used in the analyses. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02835625, and is closed to accrual.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofThe Lancet Oncologyen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectbreast tomosynthesisen
dc.subjectmammographyen
dc.subjectdigitalen
dc.subjectscreeningen
dc.subjectbreast canceren
dc.titleTwo-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trialen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesisen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30161-5
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.citation.volume20en
usyd.citation.issue6en
usyd.citation.spage795en
usyd.citation.epage805en
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.