Show simple item record

Criteria for monitoring tests were described: validity, responsiveness, detectability of long-term change, and practicality

Export
FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBell, Katy J.L.
dc.contributor.authorGlasziou, Paul
dc.contributor.authorHayen, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorIrwig, Les
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T05:08:54Z
dc.date.available2021-04-29T05:08:54Z
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25000
dc.description.abstractObjective: To describe how evidence from trials and cohort studies may be used to guide choice of test for monitoring patients with chronic disease. Study Design and Setting: Exploration of potential criteria for choosing the best monitoring test. Criteria are defined and options for assessment measures for test performance on each criterion discussed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Epidemiologyen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectchronic diseaseen
dc.subjectdisease managementen
dc.subjectdiagnostic testen
dc.subjectbiological markersen
dc.subjectreproducibility of resultsen
dc.subjectstatistical modelsen
dc.titleCriteria for monitoring tests were described: validity, responsiveness, detectability of long-term change, and practicalityen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.015
dc.relation.nhmrc633003
dc.relation.nhmrcAPP1013390
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.citation.volume67en
usyd.citation.issue2en
usyd.citation.spage152en
usyd.citation.epage159en
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

Version history

There are no previous versions of the item available.