Assessment of changes to screening programmes: why randomisation is important
| Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Bell, Katy J.L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bossuyt, Patrick | |
| dc.contributor.author | Glasziou, Paul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Irwig, Les | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-29T04:33:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-29T04:33:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/24999 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Screening programmes sometimes need to be adapted as new technologies and treatments become available. Katy Bell and colleagues argue the best way to assess such changes is through randomised trials within the programmes | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en |
| dc.relation.ispartof | British Medical Journal | en |
| dc.rights | Copyright All Rights Reserved | en |
| dc.subject | epidemiology | en |
| dc.subject | screening | en |
| dc.subject | diagnostic test | en |
| dc.subject | oncology | en |
| dc.title | Assessment of changes to screening programmes: why randomisation is important | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.subject.asrc | 1117 Public Health and Health Services | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bmj.h1566 | |
| usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Health | en |
| usyd.citation.volume | 350 | en |
| usyd.citation.spage | h1566 | en |
| workflow.metadata.only | Yes | en |
Associated file/s
There are no files associated with this item.
Associated collections