Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBell, Katy J.L.
dc.contributor.authorDoust, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorGlasziou, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-22T05:06:03Z
dc.date.available2021-04-22T05:06:03Z
dc.date.issued2018en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24965
dc.description.abstractThe recent recommendations from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) to lower the thresholds for defining hypertension follows a general pattern across medical specialties, whereby disease definitions are more frequently widened than narrowed. Such widened definitions usually label people as unwell, even if they are at low risk of a disease, and thus have the potential to cause harm. We aimed to assess the incremental benefits and harms of the definition used by the ACC/AHA guideline as compared to that used by the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC7) using the checklist.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Evidence-Based Medicineen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectblood pressureen_AU
dc.subjecthypertensionen_AU
dc.subjectdefinitionsen_AU
dc.title89 Incremental benefits and harms of the 2017 american college of cardiology/american heart association high blood pressure guidelineen_AU
dc.typeConference paperen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematologyen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.89
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.citation.spageA42en_AU
usyd.citation.epageA42en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.