Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBell, Katy J.L.
dc.contributor.authorDoust, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorGlasziou, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-22T05:06:03Z
dc.date.available2021-04-22T05:06:03Z
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24965
dc.description.abstractThe recent recommendations from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) to lower the thresholds for defining hypertension follows a general pattern across medical specialties, whereby disease definitions are more frequently widened than narrowed. Such widened definitions usually label people as unwell, even if they are at low risk of a disease, and thus have the potential to cause harm. We aimed to assess the incremental benefits and harms of the definition used by the ACC/AHA guideline as compared to that used by the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC7) using the checklist.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Evidence-Based Medicineen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectblood pressureen
dc.subjecthypertensionen
dc.subjectdefinitionsen
dc.title89 Incremental benefits and harms of the 2017 american college of cardiology/american heart association high blood pressure guidelineen
dc.typeConference paperen
dc.subject.asrc1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematologyen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.89
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.citation.spageA42en
usyd.citation.epageA42en
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.