Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBonner, Carissa
dc.contributor.authorMcKinn, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorGlasziou, Paul
dc.contributor.authorDoust, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorBell, Katy J.L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-13T02:09:09Z
dc.date.available2021-04-13T02:09:09Z
dc.date.issued2019en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24907
dc.description.abstractHeart age calculators are increasingly popular around the world as a way to promote and communicate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment to patients/consumers. While they have intuitive appeal, the implicit assumptions behind heart age calculator algorithms have important implications for informed decision making and screening programs. This presentation compares the use of heart age in three countries to illustrate potential problems for disease mongering and inadvertently expanding screening programs, and how to avoid these problems.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Evidence-Based Medicineen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectheart ageen_AU
dc.subjectcardiovascularen_AU
dc.subjectscreeningen_AU
dc.title23 Heart age: intuitive communication tool or gateway to overdiagnosis? A comparison of 3 countriesen_AU
dc.typePresentationen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematologyen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjebm-2019-POD.37
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.