Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBonner, Carissa
dc.contributor.authorMcKinn, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorGlasziou, Paul
dc.contributor.authorDoust, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorBell, Katy J.L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-13T02:09:09Z
dc.date.available2021-04-13T02:09:09Z
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24907
dc.description.abstractHeart age calculators are increasingly popular around the world as a way to promote and communicate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment to patients/consumers. While they have intuitive appeal, the implicit assumptions behind heart age calculator algorithms have important implications for informed decision making and screening programs. This presentation compares the use of heart age in three countries to illustrate potential problems for disease mongering and inadvertently expanding screening programs, and how to avoid these problems.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Evidence-Based Medicineen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
dc.subjectheart ageen
dc.subjectcardiovascularen
dc.subjectscreeningen
dc.title23 Heart age: intuitive communication tool or gateway to overdiagnosis? A comparison of 3 countriesen
dc.typePresentationen
dc.subject.asrc1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematologyen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjebm-2019-POD.37
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.