Monitoring adherence to drug treatment by using change in cholesterol concentration: secondary analysis of trial data.
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Bell, Katy J.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kirby, Adrienne | |
dc.contributor.author | Hayen, Andrew | |
dc.contributor.author | Irwig, Les | |
dc.contributor.author | Glasziou, Paul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-03T03:51:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-03T03:51:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/24598 | |
dc.description.abstract | A randomised controlled trial which aimed to estimate the accuracy of monitoring cholesterol concentration for detecting non-adherence to lipid lowering treatment. Design: Secondary analysis of data on cholesterol concentration in the LIPID (long term intervention with pravastatin in ischaemic disease) study by using three measures of non-adherence: discontinuation of treatment, allocation to placebo arm, less than 80% of pills taken. Setting: Randomised placebo controlled trial in Australia and New Zealand involving 9014 patients with previous coronary heart disease. Results: Monitoring of cholesterol concentration had modest ability for detecting complete non-adherence. One year after the start of treatment, half (1957/3937) of the non-adherent patients and 6% (253/3944) of adherent patients had a rise in concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Accuracy was reasonable (area under the curve 0.89). Cholesterol monitoring, however, had weak ability for detecting partial non-adherence. One year after the start of treatment, 16% (34/213) of partially adherent and 4% (155/3585) of fully adherent patients had a rise in concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Accuracy was poor (area under the curve 0.65). For typical pre-test probabilities of non-adherence ranging from low (25%) to high (75%), the post-test probabilities indicate continuing uncertainty after lipid testing. A patient with no change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration has a post-test probability of being completely non-adherent of between 67% and 95% and a post-test probability of being partially non-adherent of between 48% and 89%. A patient with a decrease in concentration of 1.0 mmol/L has a post-test probability of being completely non-adherent of between 7% and 40% and a post-test probability of being partially non-adherent of between 21% and 71%. Conclusions: Monitoring concentration of low density lipoprotein (or total) cholesterol has modest ability to detect complete non-adherence or non-persistence with pravastatin treatment and weak ability to detect partial non-adherence. Results of monitoring should be considered as no more than an adjunct to careful discussion with patients about adherence. | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartof | British Medical Journal | en_AU |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 | en_AU |
dc.subject | pravastatin | en_AU |
dc.subject | cholesterol | en_AU |
dc.subject | low density lipoprotein | en_AU |
dc.title | Monitoring adherence to drug treatment by using change in cholesterol concentration: secondary analysis of trial data. | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 1117 Public Health and Health Services | en_AU |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d12 | |
dc.relation.nhmrc | 402764 | |
usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Health | en_AU |
usyd.citation.volume | 342 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.issue | 7789 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.spage | d12 | en_AU |
workflow.metadata.only | Yes | en_AU |
Associated file/s
There are no files associated with this item.
Associated collections