Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBell, Katy J.L.
dc.contributor.authorKirby, Adrienne
dc.contributor.authorHayen, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorIrwig, Les
dc.contributor.authorGlasziou, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T03:51:20Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T03:51:20Z
dc.date.issued2011en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24598
dc.description.abstractA randomised controlled trial which aimed to estimate the accuracy of monitoring cholesterol concentration for detecting non-adherence to lipid lowering treatment. Design: Secondary analysis of data on cholesterol concentration in the LIPID (long term intervention with pravastatin in ischaemic disease) study by using three measures of non-adherence: discontinuation of treatment, allocation to placebo arm, less than 80% of pills taken. Setting: Randomised placebo controlled trial in Australia and New Zealand involving 9014 patients with previous coronary heart disease. Results: Monitoring of cholesterol concentration had modest ability for detecting complete non-adherence. One year after the start of treatment, half (1957/3937) of the non-adherent patients and 6% (253/3944) of adherent patients had a rise in concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Accuracy was reasonable (area under the curve 0.89). Cholesterol monitoring, however, had weak ability for detecting partial non-adherence. One year after the start of treatment, 16% (34/213) of partially adherent and 4% (155/3585) of fully adherent patients had a rise in concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Accuracy was poor (area under the curve 0.65). For typical pre-test probabilities of non-adherence ranging from low (25%) to high (75%), the post-test probabilities indicate continuing uncertainty after lipid testing. A patient with no change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration has a post-test probability of being completely non-adherent of between 67% and 95% and a post-test probability of being partially non-adherent of between 48% and 89%. A patient with a decrease in concentration of 1.0 mmol/L has a post-test probability of being completely non-adherent of between 7% and 40% and a post-test probability of being partially non-adherent of between 21% and 71%. Conclusions: Monitoring concentration of low density lipoprotein (or total) cholesterol has modest ability to detect complete non-adherence or non-persistence with pravastatin treatment and weak ability to detect partial non-adherence. Results of monitoring should be considered as no more than an adjunct to careful discussion with patients about adherence.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Medical Journalen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectpravastatinen_AU
dc.subjectcholesterolen_AU
dc.subjectlow density lipoproteinen_AU
dc.titleMonitoring adherence to drug treatment by using change in cholesterol concentration: secondary analysis of trial data.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematologyen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen_AU
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d12
dc.relation.nhmrc402764
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.citation.volume342en_AU
usyd.citation.issue7789en_AU
usyd.citation.spaged12en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.