Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHouben, Dirk
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T01:05:54Z
dc.date.available2021-02-25T01:05:54Z
dc.date.issued2020en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24564
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis we propose four novel continuous-time return smoothing models. Borrowing from the private commercial real estate literature, we start with a benchmark model for return smoothing in discrete time. The benchmark model is translated into continuous time, taking us from an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) specification for the smoothed holding period return to an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) specification for the instantaneous continuously compounding rate of return on the smoothed asset price. The model is then extended to allow for the possibility of predictability in the underlying “true” return. In a second line of investigation, we propose an alternative continuous-time return smoothing model in which we keep the OU smoothing mechanism, but replace the instantaneous smoothed return with the smoothed detrended log price. This model leads to unrealistic autocorrelations in the smoothed return, and we address this with an extension that introduces a higher-order smoothing equation described by a continuous-time autoregressive moving average (CARMA) process—the continuous-time analogue of the ARMA process. We show that each of our four models belongs to a general framework for linear return smoothing in continuous time in which a CARMA process governing the underlying “true” asset price is overlaid with a CARMA-type smoothing equation that summarises the market mechanism whereby the “true” price is transformed into a market-observed, smoothed price. In each model, as with the general framework, the noise in the “true” price is represented by a Lévy process, allowing for non-normality and sample path discontinuities. To quantify the effect the smoothing models have on holding period returns, we develop a common set of smoothing metrics. These metrics are then computed for each of the models (including the discrete-time benchmark model), and form a basis on which the models can be compared. We also rely on the autocorrelation function in appraising the impact of return smoothing. We comment on the ability of the continuous-time smoothing models to reproduce stylised statistical properties commonly associated with smoothed returns, such as a reduction in return variance and an increase in return autocorrelation. Additionally, we develop the theory needed to operationalise the smoothing metrics for the smoothing framework in general.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectreturn smoothingen_AU
dc.subjectCARMAen_AU
dc.subjectcontinuous timeen_AU
dc.titleReturn Smoothing in Discrete and Continuous Timeen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Business School::Discipline of Financeen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorMalloch, Hamish
usyd.advisorSatchell, Stephen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.